
MUMBAI, MARCH 9: The Congress policy on Bihar was determined by a simple principle: it did not mind Governor8217;s rule but could not sit back and watch the imposition of Rashtriya Swayam Sevak RSS rule, stated Congress Working Committee member Arjun Singh here on Tuesday.
He sought to defend the party8217;s stand on the grounds that the BJP-led Union Government was imposing RSS rule in the name of Article 356 and such a move had to be opposed.
8220;The sequence of events clearly shows that the Union Government wanted Bihar to be under the RSS rule,8221; he said stoutly denying that the Congress had any quid pro quo deal with Laloo Prasad Yadav or Rashtriya Janata Dal.
8220;We took the policy decision thoughtfully, he said. The party8217;s Panchmarhi declaration meant that the Congress would have no electoral truck; it would not walk on crutches in any state,8221; Singh said.
Asked about the party8217;s alliance with the Republican Party of India RPI and Samajwadi Party SP in Maharashtra during the general election last year, Singh said it was not a crutch but a meaningful gesture to show the party8217;s concern for Dalits and minorities.
In Bihar too, the Congress had taken a position that protested against Dalit atrocities in an unambiguous manner, he added.
Singh debunked Union Home Minister L K Advani8217;s reference to 8220;moral responsibility8221; on Bihar saying that the Union Government8217;s position had no moral responsibility. 8220;If Chief Minister Rabri Devi had stepped down on her own as did her Orissa counterpart J B Patnaik, it would have been a case of owning up moral responsibility,8221; he said.
Congress president Sonia Gandhi had made the prevailing situation in Maharashtra clear and it was up to the people now to decide if they preferred to continue with such a State Government or wanted a change, Singh said.