Premium
This is an archive article published on October 5, 2000

Bush, Gore celebrate, stop short of claiming victory

OCT 4: White House rivals Al Gore and George W. Bush came, they saw, they debated ... to a draw? Dressed like the candidates from central ...

.

OCT 4: White House rivals Al Gore and George W. Bush came, they saw, they debated … to a draw? Dressed like the candidates from central casting — dark suits, white shirts, red ties — the Democratic vice President and Republican Texas governor left what were ostensibly victory parties early Wednesday without declaring victory outright after their first televised debate.

At a Massachusetts Democrats debate party, Gore let wife Tipper do the talking, and she obliged, telling the excited young crowd that packed the downtown Park Plaza hotel’s Imperial Ballroom: "I think we know who won the debate tonight."

The already pumped up crowd, which had moments earlier pulsed to the music of a live rhythm and blues band, roared its approval as candidate Gore beamed and pumped his fist in the Air.

Story continues below this ad

Meanwhile, Gore’s rival, surrounded by signs proclaiming "Bush Wins," told supporters at a rally in his honor: "Boy am I glad I came to Boston tonight. What we saw tonight in the debate is that there is a big difference of opinion."

The Republican vowed to carry the November 7 election, just 34 days away, telling the excited crowd: "We are going to win because we got one of the best grassroots organizations of any campaign."

The two men, whose aides had billed Tuesday’s verbal duel as potentially the most crucial 90-minutes of the months-long campaign, began it according to the unwritten rules: stride purposefully across the stage, share a handshake and a forced smile … then come out swinging.

Bush and Gore, deadlocked in national opinion polls, strove mightily to highlight policy cleavages before an audience that included big political contributors, regular American citizens, and the candidates’ wives and families.

Story continues below this ad

But their true targets were the up to 75 million people that had been expected to tune in to watch the first of three presidential debates this month, especially the undecided and independent voters likely to determine what is shaping up to be the tightest White House contest in 40 years.

Far apart on many policy issues, the candidates stood meters (feet) apart on a stage set up in the Clark Athletic Center at the Boston branch University of Massachusetts under the watchful eye of moderator Jim Lehrer, a veteran public television reporter. Under the rules set by both sides, documents and written notes were banned, as were questions directly asked of each other.

They were also barred from moving from behind their matching wooden lecterns. In the minutes following the exchange, commentators and political figures quickly formed "spin alley," crowding the aisles with famous and not-so-famous purveyors of instant analysis. Television networks queried their "average citizens," and conducted snap polls.

A senior Gore adviser who asked not to be named consulted those speed surveys on his pager, saying: "CBS? 46-42 for Gore. CNN? 48-41 Gore. ABC? 42-39 Gore … you see a pattern here?"

Story continues below this ad

But for demonstrators outside the center the only clear pattern was the exclusion of third-party candidates, leading them to chant "open the debates." Green Party hopeful Ralph Nader was not only excluded from the debate as a participant because of low scores in national opinion polls but even denied access to the event as an audience member, witnesses said.

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement