
A week-old siege and blockade of Nepal8217;s capital by the Maoists. A series of bomb blasts at the Bangladesh opposition leader and former prime minister8217;s rally, killing nearly 20 persons and injuring 300. A political crisis and state of emergency in the Maldives, islands known for peace and beauty. An unending ethno-terrorist conflict in Sri Lanka. A slew of assassination attempts on the president, prime minister and top military commanders, not to talk of unending ethno-sectarian terrorism, in Pakistan. So how is India, as the biggest nation in the region 8212; and one with the most stable democracy 8212; to respond?
Much before the recent disturbing developments in the region, J.N. Dixit 8212; now the national security advisor to the prime minister 8212; had demanded that South Asia become a major focus of Indian foreign policy. In a piece written before the general elections for these columns, he had argued that the Congress government, if it comes to power, would 8220;nurture and expand8221; relations between India and its neighbours. He also said that such a government would strengthen SAARC to make it an effective regional organisation. However, Dixit had anticipated some of the hurdles to achieving this. He pointed out that the vision for regional stability 8212; upon which of course the success of any regional network is based 8212; is realisable only if minimal levels of internal cohesion and domestic harmony exist in the countries of the the SAARC region. Today, that is clearly not the case. The internal political churning that Dixit had anticipated is very apparent. But the fact is that Dixit8217;s government is still to get a handle on how it is to address the issue. Or indeed whether it should address it at all given regional sensitivities. Notice how siege-strung Nepal has just let India know that it is perfectly capable of handling its own internal problems.