Premium
This is an archive article published on October 4, 2007

Armstrong blasts ruling on Landis

Lance Armstrong believes an American jury surely would have ruled in favour of Floyd Landis, unlike the arbitrators who found him guilty of doping.

.

Lance Armstrong believes an American jury surely would have ruled in favour of Floyd Landis, unlike the arbitrators who found him guilty of doping. The seven-time Tour de France winner lamented the consequences of the panel disregarding 8220;shoddy8221; lab work in his first public comments about last month8217;s decision to ban Landis for two years and strip him of his Tour de France title.

8220;I didn8217;t follow Floyd8217;s case that much, but I will tell you, if that8217;s a jury trial in the United States, with eight or 10 or 12 of our fellow citizens, you get off every time. Not that you get off, but you8217;re vindicated,8221; said Armstrong.

Armstrong, who has endured doping accusations throughout his career, has criticised the French lab where Landis8217; tests were conducted.

Although the arbitrators faulted the lab8217;s practices in their ruling and warned that future errors could result in the dismissal of a positive finding, the panel still upheld Landis8217; positive doping test.

8220;When you are giving someone the death penalty, which they essentially did, you cannot tolerate shoddy work, which they clearly did,8221; Armstrong said. 8220;I don8217;t understand that type of rationale. I don8217;t understand the verdict.8221;

8220;It8217;s tough for Floyd; it8217;s tough for cycling. But at the same time, it8217;s also really tough and unfortunate for the fans of all athletes. You never know when you8217;re in that position, when an athlete8217;s in that position, and you want to make sure that every thing8217;s done right.8221;

 

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement