
Lance Armstrong believes an American jury surely would have ruled in favour of Floyd Landis, unlike the arbitrators who found him guilty of doping. The seven-time Tour de France winner lamented the consequences of the panel disregarding 8220;shoddy8221; lab work in his first public comments about last month8217;s decision to ban Landis for two years and strip him of his Tour de France title.
8220;I didn8217;t follow Floyd8217;s case that much, but I will tell you, if that8217;s a jury trial in the United States, with eight or 10 or 12 of our fellow citizens, you get off every time. Not that you get off, but you8217;re vindicated,8221; said Armstrong.
Armstrong, who has endured doping accusations throughout his career, has criticised the French lab where Landis8217; tests were conducted.
Although the arbitrators faulted the lab8217;s practices in their ruling and warned that future errors could result in the dismissal of a positive finding, the panel still upheld Landis8217; positive doping test.
8220;When you are giving someone the death penalty, which they essentially did, you cannot tolerate shoddy work, which they clearly did,8221; Armstrong said. 8220;I don8217;t understand that type of rationale. I don8217;t understand the verdict.8221;
8220;It8217;s tough for Floyd; it8217;s tough for cycling. But at the same time, it8217;s also really tough and unfortunate for the fans of all athletes. You never know when you8217;re in that position, when an athlete8217;s in that position, and you want to make sure that every thing8217;s done right.8221;