A LITTLE byplay on the inaugural evening turned out to be an apt metaphor for the 33rd International Film Festival (IFFI): Rani Mukherjee’s diya flickered out as she stood waiting, next to co-lamp girl Aishwarya Rai, for the festivities to begin. Out scurried an official from the Siri Fort wings, got the diya started up, and off marched the contingent to the official lamp-lighting. What you saw in the papers the following day was the perfect photo-op featuring the foursome of Rai, Mukherjee, chief guest Lata Mangeshkar, and Information and Broadcasting Minister Sushma Swaraj. The verdict for this year’s IFFI, which closed in New Delhi last week, was out from Day One: the worst of them all, bar none. The ‘Cinema Of The World’ section which showcases the best of international cinema (around 65 this time), has never been so lacklustre (most films were from 2001 and 2000; only six or seven of them were of festival quality), the ‘Panorama’ section has seen a shocking dip in quality, and there is, as usual, a profusion of ‘Retrospectives,’ apparently chosen at random, to hide the fact that the core of the festival is hollow. As always there were more cops, security personnel, organisers from the various arms of the I&B ministry infesting Siri Fort, rivalling in number the Press and delegates. And how do they connect with films and film people? By not recognising Adoor Gopalakrishan when he shows up at the media centre. The mild-mannered Adoor is feted around the world but he gets asked where he is from, by an official ignoramus. This year, the idea of a permanent venue which has been around for several years, seems to be firming up. The travelling circus which went, by turns, to such major film centres as Chennai, Bangalore, Thiruvananthpuram, Kolkata, Mumbai, returning to the Capital every alternate year, has seen narrower options with time. Kerala has its own festival, so does Kolkata as well as Mumbai, and these are thriving as rapidly as the IFFI is sinking. It could even be Goa, hinted one of the 20 people, all of whom were in charge of the media desk (three people do the work, the rest pfaff and drink the official tea provided free for Press and delegates). There are rumours that J Jayalalithaa has made a strong pitch for Chennai, for next year. Here we go again, around the mulberry bush. It comes down, as it always does, to the selection procedures and criteria, and their astonishing lack of transparency. Regional political satraps force rank bad movies into the Panorama; non-film people swan off to choose international movies; and we get whatever we can for the Retrospectives. At a measly Rs 2.75 crore allocated for the 10-day event, truncated from the usual 15 days, we have neither the prestige nor the money to attract the best and the brightest. Halfway through there was a belated, unofficial acknowledgement within the I&B echelons that the festival was a turkey and there were unofficial pleas made to the film trade people to rescue it, but by then it was much too late.