IT was on a steamy monsoon evening in Colombo — lounging around with a group that comprised South Asians, Europeans, a young Korean woman and others, discussing Muralitharan’s ‘doosra’ — that one of us received a mobile phone message saying South Africa had been awarded the 2010 FIFA World Cup. South Africa’s 2006 bid had been charged down and the Safs had gone overboard this time to secure the event.
How much South African government money went into backing the bid will never be revealed. Adding support to their bid on that particular Saturday, the Safs’ brigade turned up with former president and revered statesman Nelson Mandela, current president Thabo Mbeki and others. Beating the challenge of contenders like Morocco and Egypt had become an obsession. And as the nation had staged a highly successful cricket equivalent 18 months before, those involved in football felt they could run the FIFA event with equal aplomb. With the government supporting the bid, it stands to reason that millions will be siphoned into projects surrounding the event.
Not that any of this was of interest to the group in the house in the plush treelined Cinnamon Gardens district of Colombo. Any number of questions, however, came to mind. Unlike cricket with its large spread of demographic interest, football’s main following is that of the black majority. Even in the decade following the country’s first free elections, South African football has had a credibility problem and lost general support because of it; it is seen as a game divided by political as well as regional differences.
The local league and the South African Football Association (SAFA) have run into serious administration problems with two government judicial commissions probing allegations that it is a sport run by mafia-style bosses with corruption rife at all levels. One of the South African bid team — millionaire businessman Irvin Khoza — has been linked to some of the charges. Despite the commissions and their recommendations, criminal elements remain in place and they will look at the 2010 event to fatten their bank balances further. Those in charge at SAFA have long expressed concern with their inability to match the more professionally-run United Cricket Board’s development and transformation education and training programmes. These have created opportunities that SAFA have been unable to equal.
South Africa has only two major stadiums built for football. While there are smaller local venues — quite rundown — clubs have to hire the bigger rugby grounds to stage any high-profile derby. At all venues, security is a serious problem. It is at such derbies where more tickets are sold than there are seats available and leads to open confrontation among officials.
|
SA’s DREAM TEAM
The men who brought the World Cup to South Africa — Nelson Mandela, FW De Klerk, Archbishop Desmond Tutu and Thabo Mbeki — three Nobel Peace Prize awardees of which two are former presidents, and the present premier. |
|
In 2002, it led to chaotic scenes that left more than 20 dead and the abandonment of the game at the Ellis Park rugby stadium. While it caused a public outcry, the findings of the subsequent investigation were largely kept quiet in fear of stalling the 2010 bid.
Whether South Africa has the infrastructure to host a sports event of this size is another matter. A Fifa delegation investigating venues and security matters seemed to be quite happy with what they saw. Whether this was because the same expertise and techniques used for CWC 2003 will be applied is uncertain, but it is known that the FIFA bid committee have been working hard in the field to ensure safety.
Plans are being made to build new stadiums. They have six years to do this but the problems remain. Will they redevelop existing facilities or build new ones? The problem with the new facilities is what to do with them when the event is over. If what followed the rugby World Cup is an example, the sport was not universally embraced, as cricket has been.