Premium
This is an archive article published on January 19, 2023

A new headless statue dedicated to Martin Luther King Jr and Coretta Scott King sparks criticism

Defending the statue, Martin Luther King III, son of Martin Luther King Jr and Coretta Scott King, said he was grateful to see a statue representing his parents' love story and partnership

martin luther king jr statueFor a netizen, this statue is "insanely insulting" and "poorly chosen" (Source: @embracebos/Instagram)
Listen to this article
A new headless statue dedicated to Martin Luther King Jr and Coretta Scott King sparks criticism
x
00:00
1x 1.5x 1.8x

A monument – named ‘The Embrace’ – was recently unveilved in honour of Rev Dr Martin Luther King Jr and his wife Coretta Scott King on Boston Common, where the former gave a speech on April 23, 1965, to a crowd of 22,000. Designed by Brooklyn-based conceptual artist Hank Willis Thomas, it is inspired by a photograph of the couple in which they can be seen hugging after King won the Nobel Peace Prize in 1964.

The art piece, however, features only the couple’s arms during their embrace and not their heads. The 20-foot tall, 40-foot wide and 19-ton brone artwork was made up of about 609 pieces welded together.

Thomas was quoted by New York Times saying that he crafted a sculpture that spreads a message of love and reiterates the message of nonviolence and solidarity. “In that photograph of them in 1964, his arms are wrapped around her but also his weight is on her. To see her so gracefully and lovingly carrying that weight, it was a metaphor for what she was able to do throughout a huge portion of my life,” he said.

Story continues below this ad

While the statue was sculpted to impart the message of love, the idea of featuring only the arms without the heads didn’t go down well with people, who described it as disrespectful and hideous.

 

View this post on Instagram

 

A post shared by Embrace Boston (@embracebos) 

“This is why people are having this strong visceral and negative reaction to this statue and why it’s objectively ‘bad’ art: when we see body parts, in this case, arms and hands, and especially in such detail, our minds are tuned to expect the other parts to follow – a shoulder, a torso, a head. Without them, there’s an unease, like a human cloning experiment gone wrong, or a gruesome murder where a body was dismembered. This looks like something Salvador Dali might do for a totally unrelated commission,” a user wrote on Instagram.

Another added, “This monument (statue) is horrendous and an embarrassment. It’s just shitty art.”

For a netizen, this statue is “insanely insulting” and “poorly chosen”.

Defending the statue, Martin Luther King III, son of Martin Luther King Jr and Coretta Scott King, said he was grateful to see a statue representing his parents’ love story and partnership.

Story continues below this ad

“I think that’s a huge representation of bringing people together,” King said. “I think the artist did a great job. I’m satisfied. Yeah, it didn’t have my mom and dad’s images, but it represents something that brings people together. And in this time, day and age, when there’s so much division, we need symbols that talk about bringing us together,” he told CNN.

📣 For more lifestyle news, follow us on Instagram | Twitter | Facebook and don’t miss out on the latest updates!


📣 For more lifestyle news, click here to join our WhatsApp Channel and also follow us on Instagram

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement