Premium
This is an archive article published on September 4, 2018

Uttarakhand HC asks CBI to probe tiger deaths, says it has ‘sufficient material’ that shows official-poacher nexus

In the past two and a half years, upto 40 tigers and 272 leopards have died in Uttarakhand. While all these deaths were not due to poaching, the court asked the CBI to investigate the issue.

Uttarakhand HC asks CBI to probe tiger deaths, says it has 'sufficient material' that shows officer-poacher nexus In the year 2016, an incident had surfaced where five tigers were allegedly killed by poachers.

The Uttarakhand High Court Tuesday ordered a CBI investigation into tiger poaching incidents within the state while terming it as the “rarest of rare cases”.

“Generally, the Court does not order for investigation by the CBI but the present case is the rarest of rare cases where the expertise of CBI is solicited,” the Division Bench of Acting Chief Justice Rajiv Sharma and Justice Lok Pal Singh mentioned in an order.

The bench also said that “sufficient material has come on record which shows the involvement of the (forest department) oficers with the poachers.”

Story continues below this ad

In the year 2016, an incident had surfaced where five tigers were allegedly killed by poachers. A report submitted by Uttarakhand Principal Chief Conservator of Forest (PCCF) Jai Raj in June, this year, held former Uttarakhand Chief Wildlife Warden Digvijay Singh Khati and former Corbett Tiger Reserve Director Samir Sinha responsible for “administrative laxity” that had resulted in the poaching of those five tigers.

In the past two and a half years, upto 40 tigers and 272 leopards have died in Uttarakhand. While all these deaths were not due to poaching, the court asked the CBI to investigate the issue.

“We request the CBI to hold preliminary enquiry into all the cases of poaching in the State of Uttarakhand and to find out the complicity/involvement/ connivance/ collusion of the serving Officers/ Officials of the Forest Officers/officials in the last 5 years in view of the data placed on record by the petitioners,” the Bench ordered.

Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Loading Taboola...
Advertisement