New Delhi | Updated: September 24, 2024 09:12 AM IST
2 min read
Whatsapp
twitter
Facebook
Reddit
After rejecting the SBI’s prayer, Justice Sahi told the counsel, “you shouldn’t do things lightly when it is a sitting HC judge”. (File Photo)
The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) on Monday declined to give State Bank of India (SBI) more time to make submissions on its plea seeking transfer outside Tamil Nadu of a consumer complaint filed against it by Madras HC judge Justice J Nisha Banu over a home loan repayment dispute.
Commission chief Justice A P Sahi, presiding over the bench which included Member Inder Jit Singh, said they will pass a detailed order. Justice Sahi orally told Justice Banu’s counsel, who urged NCDRC to “impose some heavy costs”, “you better leave that. You know, again media, again Supreme Court. They are not going to stay here. You have to be careful. But we will do everything what is possible.”
As the bench took up the matter on Monday, a counsel for the bank urged the Commission, which had issued notice on the SBI plea on August 2, to adjourn the matter as Advocate Jitendra Kumar, who was due to appear on the bank’s behalf, was unwell. It, however, said two more advocates had signed the vakalatnama and “they” too “are not present in court nor is there any indication about their status as to whether they are well/ unwell”. It said in its order: “…this is a mere excuse undertaken to seek adjournment. We rejected the same… We will pass a detailed order…,” it said.
After rejecting the SBI’s prayer, Justice Sahi told the counsel, “you shouldn’t do things lightly when it is a sitting HC judge”.
Ananthakrishnan G. is a Senior Assistant Editor with The Indian Express. He has been in the field for over 23 years, kicking off his journalism career as a freelancer in the late nineties with bylines in The Hindu. A graduate in law, he practised in the District judiciary in Kerala for about two years before switching to journalism. His first permanent assignment was with The Press Trust of India in Delhi where he was assigned to cover the lower courts and various commissions of inquiry.
He reported from the Delhi High Court and the Supreme Court of India during his first stint with The Indian Express in 2005-2006. Currently, in his second stint with The Indian Express, he reports from the Supreme Court and writes on topics related to law and the administration of justice. Legal reporting is his forte though he has extensive experience in political and community reporting too, having spent a decade as Kerala state correspondent, The Times of India and The Telegraph. He is a stickler for facts and has several impactful stories to his credit. ... Read More