Editors Guild condemns AG’s remark that media used ‘stolen’ Rafale documents

In a statement, the Editors Guild said: “Although the Attorney General later clarified that the investigation and contemplated action would not be initiated against journalists or lawyers who used these documents, the Guild is perturbed over such threats. These will intimidate the media in general and curb its freedom to report and commend on the Rafale deal in particular.

“Any attempt to use the Official Secrets Act against the media is a reprehensible as asking the journalists to disclose their sources,” it added.

Attorney General K K Venugopal Wednesday told the Supreme Court that reports published in The Hindu and ANI, based on documents relating to the Rafale deal, cannot be the subject of judicial process as it was a matter of national security. He also said that the government would initiate “criminal action” against the two publications and a lawyer, believed to be Prashant Bhushan, since the matter was of sensitive nature and is covered by the Official Secrets Act.

Also read | This govt’s job is to make things disappear, says Rahul Gandhi on ‘stolen documents’

The Court was hearing a petition — incidentally filed by Bhushan on behalf of himself and former Union Ministers Yashwant Sinha and Arun Shourie — seeking review of its December 14, 2018, judgment which dismissed all PILs seeking a probe into alleged irregularities in the Rafale deal.

Curated For You

Shark Tank’s Ritesh Agarwal reacts to Virat Kohli choosing a Rs 2,058 cr Indian sportswear company over Puma’s Rs 300 cr deal: ‘This is a sign that…’

‘I’m not joking’: Google engineer stunned after AI coding tool builds in 1 hour what her team spent a year on

Dhurandhar Box Office Collection Worldwide Day 31 Update: Ranveer Singh’s mints Rs 1240 crore worldwide gross; surpasses Dangal, Padmaavat, Bajrangi Bhaijaan