Supreme Court to hear pleas challenging the acquittal of 2006 Mumbai blasts accused (File)
The Supreme Court will Thursday hear the appeal challenging the Bombay High Court verdict acquitting all 12 convicts in the 2006 Mumbai train blasts, which killed 189 people, after the Maharashtra Government approached the top court against the judgment.
Seeking an urgent hearing in the matter, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for Maharashtra, informed a bench presided by Chief Justice of India B R Gavai, “It’s a serious matter from the government’s point of view… There is an element of urgency.
Solicitor General Mehta said the state had already prepared the appeal, and sought a hearing Wednesday.
CJI Gavai pointed out that eight of the convicts had already been released. “Yes, still we would like your lordships to consider it at the earliest,” said the Solicitor General.
CJI Gavai then said it will be listed for Thursday.
The convicts have already spent over 18 years in jail.
On Monday, the Bombay High Court overturned the September 2015 judgment of a special court designated under the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crimes Act (MCOCA), which had sentenced five convicts to death and given life term to seven in the 7/11 Mumbai train blasts. While the special court acquitted one person, the state government had not filed an appeal before the high court against the same. One person died while in prison.
The high court observed that the prosecution “utterly failed to establish the offences beyond a reasonable doubt against the accused on each count.”
The lawyer for the state government did not seek a stay of the judgment’s operation after it was pronounced by the bench of Justices Anil S Kilor and Shyam C Chandak on Monday morning. The bench ordered the release of all convicts in the case, given that they are not required to be detained in any other case.
Hours after the High Court acquitted the convicts, eight of them were released from different jails in the state by the evening. While two were not released due to pending cases against them, one died due to COVID-19 in 2021, and another was already out on parole