Premium
This is an archive article published on February 24, 2015

Explained: Taking the toll

Manasi Phadke on the toll, the protests, and why Maharashtra can’t give up its big source of revenue.

At present Maharashtra has 131 such road toll booths. At present Maharashtra has 131 such road toll booths.

Veteran CPI leader Govind Pansare, who succumbed to bullet injuries on February 16, was spearheading the anti-road toll agitation in Maharashtra. Manasi Phadke on the toll, the protests, and why Maharashtra can’t give up its big source of revenue:

Why is the toll important to Maharashtra?

Maharashtra was one of the first few states to privatise construction of roads. Most of the 137-odd road works cleared since 1989 have been on ‘build, operate, transfer’ basis, with a private entity constructing the road, maintaining it by collecting toll for a pre-determined period, and then handing over the project to the state government. Some of these projects were also awarded as cash contracts, with the government charging the toll. The projects translate into a combined road length of 4,685 km, or about 2 per cent of Maharashtra’s road length, and into a total cost of about Rs 15,220 crore. With this amount over five times the annual state budget for road works, it desperately needs road toll to fund the projects. Government sources put the annual road toll revenue at Rs 750 crore a year.

Why the resistance to toll in the state?

One of the key arguments is the lack of transparency, that there is not much clarity on how the toll collection period and the amount of toll are decided. While the state government generally finalises these parameters on the basis of traffic density, activists say this is often flawed, leading to the private toll collection company reaping huge windfalls. They also question the lack of maintenance and inadequate infrastructure on roads and highways, in terms of clean toilets, parking bays, ambulance services, despite toll being charged. Other allegations include favours being granted to private toll collection contractors. In Kolhapur, where Govind Pansare was leading the anti-toll campaign, locals have accused IRB Infrastructure of inflating the project cost and completing only 90 per cent of the work.

Where do political parties stand on this?

Story continues below this ad

Almost all major political parties have protested against toll collection at some point or the other. The MNS had run a shrill campaign, taking to the streets, vandalising toll booths and refusing to pay toll, in the run-up to the Assembly elections. The Shiv Sena and BJP, whose government in the 1990s was instrumental in approving the ‘build, operate, transfer’ contracts, have in recent months opposed toll collection. Earlier, they had criticised the previous Congress-NCP government for maintaining that while smaller tolls could be closed, it would not be feasible to completely do away with toll tax in Maharashtra. In government now, they are yet to take any action. In fact, CM Devendra Fadnavis recently said ‘toll-free Maharashtra’ was just a concept and not a poll promise.

What has been the state government response?

The previous Congress-NCP government had ended toll collection at a few places, and worked out a new policy to make contracts more transparent. The provisions included display of collection details at booths, monitoring of traffic flows with digital metres and by government staff, and a police chowki at each booth. All contracts were to be e-tendered and toll to be based on the length of the road, with allowances for annual fluctuations, with booths to be at least 45 km apart. The new BJP-Shiv Sena government has now formed a panel to review toll plazas, including a separate committee to look for solutions to the Kolhapur toll logjam.

How many toll booths does Maharashtra have?

Currently, 131, down from 169 two years ago.

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement