Newsletters

Edition

International .(Open in new tab)

Journalism of Courage

Premium

This is an archive article published on June 12, 2024

NEET UG Row: Retest for 1,563 candidates an option; exam sanctity affected, says top court

The Indian Express has learned that the committee, headed by a former UPSC chairman, in its first few meetings, has discussed offering all 1,563 candidates to either sit for a retest or accept the “non-normalised score”, which is what these students had actually achieved before the addition of grace marks.

A protest against the NEET exam in Pune, Tuesday.

A retest for all 1,563 candidates who were awarded “grace marks” for “loss of time” in the National Eligibility-cum-Entrance Test (Undergraduate) this year is among the options being considered by the four-member committee formed last week by the National Testing Agency (NTA) following an uproar over the extraordinarily large number of candidates scoring well in the entrance test this time — 67 secured the perfect score of 720/720.

Read |

NEET UG Results Row 2024 Live Updates:

The Indian Express has learned that the committee, headed by a former UPSC chairman, in its first few meetings, has discussed offering all 1,563 candidates to either sit for a retest or accept the “non-normalised score”, which is what these students had actually achieved before the addition of grace marks.

The committee, whose exact composition hasn’t been disclosed by the government, is expected to submit its recommendation to the NTA in the next two days, sources said.

Story continues below this ad

Also Read | NEET controversy: MCQ-based examination isn’t the right way to spot doctors

On Tuesday, the Supreme Court, while hearing a petition seeking cancellation of the exams amid allegations of leakage of the NEET-UG paper, said the exam “sanctity has been affected” and sought answers from the NTA and the Centre.

A protest against the NEET exam.

“It’s not so simple that because you have done it (conducted the exam), it’s sacrosanct. We need answers for that… The sanctity has been affected. So we need answers,” Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah, part of a two-judge bench, told the NTA counsel.

ALSO READ | NEET UG 2024: Meet Mumbai’s Maulik Patel, a cancer survivor who scored 715/720 in first attempt

But the bench, presided by Justice Vikram Nath, declined to stay the counselling and tagged the petition with another which is to be heard on July 8 by a bench led by Chief Justice of India D Y Chandrachud.

Read | Supreme Court seeks NTA’s response, says ‘sanctity has been affected, so we need answers’

“Let the counselling start. We are not stopping the counselling,” Justice Nath said when Senior Advocate Mathews J Nedumpara, appearing for the petitioners, urged the bench to stay the counselling.

Story continues below this ad

Announced on June 4, the NEET-UG results drew immediate attention after 67 candidates got the perfect score of 720/720 and some candidates got 718 or 719 — marks others claimed were not possible in the scheme of the exam.

The NTA attributed this to a combination of factors including a relatively easier paper, the decision to award additional marks to students who lost time during the exam because of errors and delays on the part of NTA staff and invigilators, and an incorrect question.

Of these three reasons, as many as 1,563 candidates, across six test centres, witnessed an artificial bump in their results on account of the additional marks awarded to them in proportion to the time they lost because of mistakes made by invigilation staff.

Of the six centres, two were in Chhattisgarh (one each in Balod and Dantewada), one each in Meghalaya, Surat, Haryana’s Bahadurgarh and Chandigarh.

Story continues below this ad

According to video footage reviewed by the NTA, it was determined that candidates across the six centres had lost up to 40 minutes and were compensated appropriately with grace marks on the basis of a normalisation formula from a 2018 Supreme Court judgement regarding a similar incident in CLAT. The NEET-UG paper duration is 200 minutes.

The announcement of NEET-UG results was followed by an uproar, forcing the NTA and the Ministry of Education’s hand to constitute a committee to at least review the results of the 1,563 candidates.

Explained | Why is there controversy around NEET this year?

“Although this is not the final decision, many members are leaning towards the option of asking these candidates to either accept their raw score (pre-normalisation) score or sit for a retest. Majority of the 1,500 candidates scored less than 300 out of 720 marks even after normalisation. It was felt they may not come forward for the retest even if offered as an option. For the remaining numbers it will not be too difficult to conduct the exam again,” said a source who did not wish to be identified.

The Directorate General of Health Services hasn’t announced the counselling schedule yet. If the NTA finally decides to conduct a retest, it will have to consult DGHS to ensure that the results are announced before the counselling process begins.

Story continues below this ad

Around 24 lakh candidates took the entrance examination held on May 5 in 571 cities, 14 of which were outside India. According to the latest available data, there are a total of 1,08,940 MBBS seats in more than 700 medical colleges across the country.

In the Supreme Court, a fresh writ petition, filed by a batch of students, raised doubts about the sanctity of the examination in the light of allegations of the paper leak and urged the court to cancel it and to direct NTA to hold it again.

In their plea, the students said, “After having stumbled upon news of the NEET exam paper leak, they have been shaken… the Petitioners are under tremendous stress and anxiety … their family members nurtured the dream of Petitioners becoming a medical practitioner one day.”

Hearing a similar plea on May 17, a CJI-led bench had declined to stay the declaration of the NEET exam results and posted the matter for hearing on July 8. – With ENS

Deeksha Teri

Deeksha Teri covers education and has worked with the The Hindu (print division), WION and Stonebow Media. She is an alumnus of The University of Lincoln and The University of Delhi. ... Read More

Anonna Dutt

Anonna Dutt is a Principal Correspondent who writes primarily on health at the Indian Express. She reports on myriad topics ranging from the growing burden of non-communicable diseases such as diabetes and hypertension to the problems with pervasive infectious conditions. She reported on the government’s management of the Covid-19 pandemic and closely followed the vaccination programme. Her stories have resulted in the city government investing in high-end tests for the poor and acknowledging errors in their official reports. Dutt also takes a keen interest in the country’s space programme and has written on key missions like Chandrayaan 2 and 3, Aditya L1, and Gaganyaan. She was among the first batch of eleven media fellows with RBM Partnership to End Malaria. She was also selected to participate in the short-term programme on early childhood reporting at Columbia University’s Dart Centre. Dutt has a Bachelor’s Degree from the Symbiosis Institute of Media and Communication, Pune and a PG Diploma from the Asian College of Journalism, Chennai. She started her reporting career with the Hindustan Times. When not at work, she tries to appease the Duolingo owl with her French skills and sometimes takes to the dance floor. ... Read More