The Supreme Court will on Wednesday hear the petition filed by former Maharashtra Chief Minister Uddhav Thackeray challenging the Election Commission of India’s (EC) decision to recognise the Eknath Shinde-led faction as the real Shiv Sena and allot the party name and the ‘bow and arrow’ poll symbol to it.
Senior advocate Kapil Sibal mentioned the plea before a bench presided by Chief Justice of India D Y Chandrachud, which agreed to take it up at 3.30 pm on Wednesday.
Urging the court to take it up on Wednesday morning, Sibal said, “If this (EC order) is not stayed, what will happen is they (Shinde-led Sena) will take over everything, the bank accounts. They have already taken over the office; we will be disqualified further.”
The court, however, pointed out that since it will hear petitions filed by the Shinde and Thackeray camps in the wake of last year’s political fallout starting Tuesday, it did not want to disturb that bench and would take up the fresh plea Wednesday afternoon.
The CJI also said the judges had not read the file and would like to read it before taking it up for hearing.
In his petition, Thackeray contended that the EC could not have relied on the legislative majority test, as disqualification proceedings against Shinde’s supporters are still pending. If disqualified, the Shinde faction would not have a legislative majority, he said.
Stating that he enjoys majority in the Legislative Council and Rajya Sabha, Thackeray said that in a situation where there is a conflict in legislative majority, along with the possibility of some of the members losing their right of membership, legislative majority alone is not a safe guide for the purpose of adjudicating a petition under Para 15 of the Symbols Order.
Para 15 of the Election Symbols (Reservation and Allotment) Order, 1968, deals with the EC’s powers regarding splinter groups or rival factions of a recognised party.
Accusing the EC of acting in a biased and unfair manner, the plea said the poll panel had failed to discharge its duties as a neutral arbiter of disputes under Para 15 of the Symbols Order, and had undermined its constitutional status.
Thackeray also contested the EC’s findings that the Sena’s constitution was “undemocratic”. He said there was absolutely no challenge to the provisions of the party constitution until the matter was being heard, when, for the first time, an objection was raised about the validity of the amended constitution.
Since there was no challenge, he never had the opportunity to rebut it, Thackeray said.
Shinde, too, was appointed as a Shiv Sena deputy leader under the amended party constitution of 2018, he said. Having reaped the benefit for four years, Shinde cannot now turn back and challenge the constitution, he submitted.