Premium
This is an archive article published on July 8, 2018

Man acquitted of murder for second time on ground of unsound mind

Calling the order of the sessions court “totally erroneous”, the bench held that the accused has sufficient evidence of suffering from schizophrenia prior to occurrence of the incident and also after the incident.

jharkhand, juvenile justice board, juvenile justice board ranchi, sapphire international school, indian express, india news According to the prosecution, on November 8, 2007, the man, a resident of Kango Estate, Evergreen, assaulted his building’s watchman Devendra Chavan with a knife, because the latter did not obey his orders regarding watering plants at his home. (Representational Image)

TAKING into consideration that he was of unsound mind, the Bombay High Court last week acquitted a 41-year-old man convicted of murdering his building’s watchman for not obeying his instructions. This is the second acquittal in a murder case for the man, with a previous murder case against him also ending in acquittal on the same grounds, in 2001.

The court was hearing a petition challenging a session’s court order convicting the Mira Road resident and sentencing him to life imprisonment. A division bench of Justice B R Gavai and Sarang V Kotwal, held, “..the Appellant (Shaikh) was incapable of knowing the nature of the act by reason of unsoundness of his mind and thus is entitled to benefit of Section 84 (act of a person of unsound mind) of the Indian Penal Code.”

According to the prosecution, on November 8, 2007, the man, a resident of Kango Estate, Evergreen, assaulted his building’s watchman Devendra Chavan with a knife, because the latter did not obey his orders regarding watering plants at his home.

Story continues below this ad

Chavan was declared dead and an offence under Section 302 (murder) of the IPC was registered at Mira Road police station. The man’s lawyer argued before HC, that the convict does not dispute that he committed the act, but that he is entitled to benefit under Section 84 of the IPC, which was erroneously negated by the trial court.

However, the assistant public prosecutor told the court that if the man is acquitted, he may commit a third murder. The court was informed that the man had in the past murdered a person name Manjit Kavetia. In that case, the trial court had in September 2001, acquitted him saying he is entitled to the benefit of Section 84 of the IPC.

Calling the order of the sessions court “totally erroneous”, the bench held that the accused has sufficient evidence of suffering from schizophrenia prior to occurrence of the incident and also after the incident.

The court said, “It could thus be seen that, even if a reasonable doubt is created in the mind of the Court with regard to mental condition of the accused at the time of occurrence, a benefit has to be given to the accused.” The court order said, “We are therefore of the considered view that, in the present case, Appellant/Accused is entitled to the benefit of Section 84 of IPC and thus he will have to be acquitted.”

Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Loading Taboola...
Advertisement