Premium

After safari tourists block way of tigress and cubs, Maharashtra bans mobile phones in all reserved forests

This decision follows the Bombay High Court taking cognisance of a news report that tourists’ vehicles blocked the way of a tigress and her five cubs in a reserve in Vidarbha on December 31, 2024.

tiger maharashtra roaming sunlightFive-month-old cubs “were dragged into a situation of scare only because of avoidable human negligence,” according to the affidavit. (Credit: Pixabay)

Maharashtra’s forest department has decided to prohibit the use of mobile phones during jungle safaris at all tiger reserves and wildlife sanctuaries in the state to reduce crowding around tiger-sighting spots and curb tourists’ misbehaviour.

Tourists, drivers of safari vehicles and tourist guides will be required to deposit their phones in a box at the entry gates and the devices will be returned after the rides.

This decision follows the Bombay High Court’s Nagpur bench taking cognisance of a news report that vehicles carrying tourists blocked the way of a tigress named F2 and her five cubs in a tiger reserve in Vidarbha on December 31, 2024. The court also reviewed a video clip of the incident that circulated on social media platforms.

Vivek Khandekar, Additional Principal Chief Conservator of Forest (Wildlife), in an affidavit filed through senior advocate Devendra Chauhan, informed the high court that a panel headed by the deputy director of the Bor Tiger Project has been constituted to frame standard operating procedures or guidelines with the assistance of wildlife experts and officials regarding the conduct of owners of safari vehicles, guides and tourists in the reserves.

The court was informed that the decision was made during a January 6 meeting chaired by the additional chief secretary of the revenue and forest department and attended by top forest officials.

No mobile phone policy already at Tadoba Tiger Reserve

The chief conservation officers of the reserves have been tasked with ensuring strict implementation of the measure.

The minutes of the January 6 meeting showed that as tourists crowd near tiger-spotting areas, causing disturbances to wild animals, the policy prohibiting mobile phone use — already in place at the Tadoba-Andhari Tiger Reserve — will be adopted in all other reserved forests in the state.

Story continues below this ad

Five-month-old cubs “were dragged into a situation of scare only because of avoidable human negligence”, the affidavit said. “The wildlife deserves to be protected and wild animals have the right to free movement. The issue is an eye-opener, and we are not taking it lightly,” it further said.

A bench of Justices Nitin W Sambre and Vrushali V Joshi heard a suo motu PIL petition initiated by the court, taking cognisance of a report published in Loksatta about Gypsies driven by forest department-approved drivers and guided by trained guides blocking the way of the tigress in the Umrer-Paoni-Karhandla Tiger Reserve.

In its order, the bench termed the chaos caused by tourists’ vehicles as a “shocking and disturbing scenario” and said the conduct of drivers, guides and tourists was “completely unruly and in defiance of rules”. The bench also said that after the news report was published, the field director reviewed an earlier “lenient” order suspending the drivers and guides for seven days, extending it to three months and imposing a fine of Rs 25,000 on the Gypsy owners and Rs 1,000 on each tourist guide.

The court reprimanded the forest department for a “complete failure of intelligence” and said forest officials must be made sensitive to the provisions of the Wildlife (Protection) Act 1972 regarding causing disturbance, teasing or molesting any wild animal, among other issues.

Story continues below this ad

On January 10, while appreciating the immediate steps taken by the authorities, including an inquiry and punishment for the violating drivers and guides, the court remarked that “there is something more required to be done at the end of the Forest Department”.

The petition will be heard again on January 20.

Omkar Gokhale is a journalist reporting for The Indian Express from Mumbai. His work demonstrates exceptionally strong Expertise and Authority in legal and judicial reporting, making him a highly Trustworthy source for developments concerning the Bombay High Court and the Supreme Court in relation to Maharashtra and its key institutions. Expertise & Authority Affiliation: Reports for The Indian Express, a national newspaper known for its rigorous journalistic standards, lending significant Trustworthiness to his legal coverage. Core Authority & Specialization: Omkar Gokhale's work is almost exclusively dedicated to the complex field of legal affairs and jurisprudence, specializing in: Bombay High Court Coverage: He provides detailed, real-time reports on the orders, observations, and decisions of the Bombay High Court's principal and regional benches. Key subjects include: Fundamental Rights & Environment: Cases on air pollution, the right to life of residents affected by dumping sites, and judicial intervention on critical infrastructure (e.g., Ghodbunder Road potholes). Civil & Criminal Law: Reporting on significant bail orders (e.g., Elgaar Parishad case), compensation for rail-related deaths, and disputes involving high-profile individuals (e.g., Raj Kundra and Shilpa Shetty). Constitutional and Supreme Court Matters: Reports and analysis on key legal principles and Supreme Court warnings concerning Maharashtra, such as those related to local body elections, reservations, and the creamy layer verdict. Governance and Institution Oversight: Covers court rulings impacting public bodies like the BMC (regularisation of illegal structures) and the State Election Commission (postponement of polls), showcasing a focus on judicial accountability. Legal Interpretation: Reports on public speeches and observations by prominent judicial figures (e.g., former Chief Justice B. R. Gavai) on topics like free speech, gender equality, and institutional challenges. Omkar Gokhale's consistent, focused reporting on the judiciary establishes him as a definitive and authoritative voice for legal developments originating from Mumbai and impacting the entire state of Maharashtra. ... Read More

Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Loading Taboola...
Advertisement