Premium
This is an archive article published on September 2, 2022

Court allows NIA to file additional evidence collected during Elgaar probe

The NIA had made an application before the special court stating that some evidence, including statements of protected witnesses, were required to be brought on record as evidence in the case against the accused in the Gadchiroli attack case as it has a bearing on it.

Gadchiroli attack case, Gadchiroli, Elgaar Parishad case, Mumbai news, Mumbai city news, Mumbai, Maharashtra, Maharashtra government, India news, Indian Express News Service, Express News Service, Express News, Indian Express India NewsThe defence counsel had said the procedure adopted by the NIA to bring on record the case was not proper and it should not be allowed.

A special court in a recent order allowed the National Investigation Agency (NIA) to file additional evidence in the Gadchiroli security personnel attack case, collected during its probe in the Elgaar Parishad case.

The NIA had made an application before the special court stating that some evidence, including statements of protected witnesses, were required to be brought on record as evidence in the case against the accused in the Gadchiroli attack case as it has a bearing on it.

The defence counsel had said the procedure adopted by the NIA to bring on record the case was not proper and it should not be allowed.

Story continues below this ad

However, Special Judge Rajesh Katariya said the NIA plea was partly allowed and the prosecution was permitted to produce the documents on record. On May 1, 2019, 15 security personnel and one civilian were killed in Gadchiroli. It is alleged that the conspiracy for the attack was hatched by members of the banned CPI(Maoist). The NIA has said statements recorded in the Elgaar Parishad case refer to Sathyanarayana Rani, an accused in the Gadchiroli case and hence are required to be brought on record.

“It is submitted that the prosecution is required to bring the said evidence in the present case which has proof and relevance in respect of the present case, as such it is just and necessary to bring the same on record in support of prosecution evidence,” the NIA plea before the special court said.

Lawyer Shifa Khan, representing Rani, submitted before the court that there was an objection not to the documents but the manner in which the NIA sought to bring them on record. Khan further said the evidence was not part of the chargesheet or supplementary chargesheet in the case and cannot be allowed through an application at a belated stage.

Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Loading Taboola...
Advertisement