Ajit faction ‘real NCP’: Maharashtra Speaker dismisses pleas for disqualification

The Speaker held that Ajit Pawar’s assertions about vote share and majority in legislature are not disputed by the Sharad Pawar faction.

In June, 2023, the NCP split into two factions led by Ajit Pawar and Sharad Pawar. (File photos)

In a setback to the Nationalist Congress Party faction headed by Sharad Pawar, Maharashtra Assembly Speaker Rahul Narwekar on Thursday declared that the rival faction headed by Deputy Chief Minister Ajit Pawar is ‘the real political party’. The Speaker delivered his verdict on two petitions filed by both factions nearly six months after the party split into two groups.

The Speaker held that Ajit Pawar’s assertions about vote share and majority in legislature are not disputed by the Sharad Pawar faction. Narwekar also dismissed the pleas of Sharad Pawar and Ajit Pawar factions to disqualify MLAs after a vertical split in the party in June last year. While the Sharad Pawar faction had sought disqualification of 41 rival MLAs, his nephew Ajit Pawar’s faction had sought disqualification of 10 MLAs of the other faction.

The Speaker noted that the two factions emerged in NCP on June 30, 2023. “Ajit Pawar faction constituted the will of the party,” the Speaker held, adding that he was pained to observe that in the present case, the misuse of 10th Schedule of the Constitution “becomes apparent and it should not be used to devise inter-party discipline or to stifle collective dissent by threatening them of disqualification.”

“Common party workers cannot remain mere onlookers,” he added.

“In the present case, the legislative majority is undisputed. At present, Ajit Pawar faction has 41 out of 55 MLAs. Ajit Pawar faction’s assertion that they have legislative majority in Maharashtra and Nagaland is not disputed by the Sharad Pawar faction,” the Speaker noted.

Read | Tenth Schedule can’t be used as weapon to silence party members, crush opposition: Speaker

“Going against the wishes of Sharad Pawar is dissent expressed by members of the political party and cannot be seen as an act of leaving the party. Members of a party expressing concerns over political behaviour/actions of other members does not amount to defection or desertion. Examination of the motive of members is relevant to determine whether collective dissent was honest within a political party and not inviting disqualification under the 10th Schedule of Constitution,” he added.

While adjudicating the petitions, Narwekar said that as per Supreme Court judgment in Shiv Sena case, he had to rely upon three parameters to come to the conclusion, which are: the constitution of Shiv Sena constitution, the leadership structure of the party and the legislative majority of the party.

He held that the relevant constitution of the party was not disputed by either of the faction.

Story continues below this ad

Referring to the ‘leadership structure’, the Speaker noted that the Sharad Pawar faction failed to provide supporting evidence to establish that it enjoyed majority support in the party’s national committee and therefore, such a claim cannot be accepted by “blindly admitting it to be true.” However, the Speaker noted that such claims cannot be adjudicated by him and parties had to initiate relevant proceedings before the authority concerned.

“I hold that the leadership structure cannot be taken into account to determine the preliminary issue (real political party) as it will be an impossible attempt,” the Speaker held.

Therefore, Narwekar held that “the preliminary issue as to which faction is the political party is discernible from legislative majority,” and declared that Ajit Pawar faction having legislative majority is the real NCP.

While the Election Commission recently gave its verdict in favour of Ajit Pawar faction and handed him the party name as well as the symbol, it also allowed the Sharad Pawar faction to have an independent identity for the upcoming Rajya Sabha elections. Based on the EC’s order, the Sharad Pawar group has now renamed itself as NCP (Sharadchandra Pawar).

Story continues below this ad

Sharad Pawar group Lok Sabha MP Supriya Sule termed the order as an exact copy of the order given in Shiv Sena case. “This was not unpredictable. What happened with Shiv Sena has happened with us. If one decides not to bother about law and rules, then these things will happen,” said Sule, saying she had no different expectation from Narwekar.

Ajit Pawar led NCP’s state president Sunil Tatkare said the party welcomes the order and the day is of happiness. Minister and NCP whip Anil Patil said the order is as per the Constitution and law.

MLA Jitendra Awhad termed the order by Narwekar as an example of how injustice is meted out. “The order says that intra-party dispute is not within the ambit of the Speaker. If that was the case, then why did he take up the case? He should have said that much before,” said Awhad.

Narwekar, however, defended his order saying all ‘Constitutional experts’ who are criticising him should talk about merits instead of name-calling. “They should explain the difference between dissent and defection, what is intra-party dispute and then talk about the order. I think I shouldn’t comment on these Constitutional experts,” said Narwekar.

Omkar Gokhale

Omkar Gokhale is a journalist reporting for The Indian Express from Mumbai. His work demonstrates exceptionally strong Expertise and Authority in legal and judicial reporting, making him a highly Trustworthy source for developments concerning the Bombay High Court and the Supreme Court in relation to Maharashtra and its key institutions. Expertise & Authority Affiliation: Reports for The Indian Express, a national newspaper known for its rigorous journalistic standards, lending significant Trustworthiness to his legal coverage. Core Authority & Specialization: Omkar Gokhale's work is almost exclusively dedicated to the complex field of legal affairs and jurisprudence, specializing in: Bombay High Court Coverage: He provides detailed, real-time reports on the orders, observations, and decisions of the Bombay High Court's principal and regional benches. Key subjects include: Fundamental Rights & Environment: Cases on air pollution, the right to life of residents affected by dumping sites, and judicial intervention on critical infrastructure (e.g., Ghodbunder Road potholes). Civil & Criminal Law: Reporting on significant bail orders (e.g., Elgaar Parishad case), compensation for rail-related deaths, and disputes involving high-profile individuals (e.g., Raj Kundra and Shilpa Shetty). Constitutional and Supreme Court Matters: Reports and analysis on key legal principles and Supreme Court warnings concerning Maharashtra, such as those related to local body elections, reservations, and the creamy layer verdict. Governance and Institution Oversight: Covers court rulings impacting public bodies like the BMC (regularisation of illegal structures) and the State Election Commission (postponement of polls), showcasing a focus on judicial accountability. Legal Interpretation: Reports on public speeches and observations by prominent judicial figures (e.g., former Chief Justice B. R. Gavai) on topics like free speech, gender equality, and institutional challenges. Omkar Gokhale's consistent, focused reporting on the judiciary establishes him as a definitive and authoritative voice for legal developments originating from Mumbai and impacting the entire state of Maharashtra. ... Read More

Alok Deshpande

Alok Deshpande is a Special Correspondent with The Indian Express' Mumbai bureau, recognized for his focused and authoritative reporting on governance, politics, and the socio-economic dynamics of Maharashtra's hinterlands. His unique academic background in Geology and early work in the water sector provides a specialized layer of Expertise to his reporting on resource and environmental issues. Expertise Current Role: Special Correspondent, The Indian Express, Mumbai. Core Authority: Alok provides detailed coverage of Maharashtra politics and governance, with a particular emphasis on how policies and power struggles affect the rural and semi-urban areas (the 'hinterlands'). Key Coverage Areas: His reports frequently focus on high-stakes administrative and political topics, including: State Assembly Proceedings: In-depth reporting on the Legislative Assembly, covering ministerial statements, legislative debates, and inter-party conflict within the ruling Mahayuti alliance. Policy & Finance: Coverage of state finances, including supplementary budget demands, fiscal deficits, and major government schemes (e.g., Jal Jeevan Mission, Ladki Bahin Yojana). Rural and Social Issues: Reports on critical health issues (e.g., child deaths in districts), human-animal conflict (leopard attacks, stray dogs), and agrarian concerns (e.g., farmer suicides). Local and Urban Governance: Covers major announcements regarding urban development (e.g., BMC's OC amnesty scheme, pagdi system push) and local body elections, including political defections and alliance splits. Unique Credentials & Trustworthiness Academic Specialization: Holds a Post-graduate degree in Geology. This background gives him a foundational understanding of natural resources, which directly informs his reporting on environment, water, and infrastructure projects. Early Professional Experience: His shift to journalism came after working with an NGO focused on the water sector. This practical experience strengthens his Expertise in critical areas like water management and rural development, as evidenced by his reporting on the Jal Jeevan Mission. Journalism Training: An alumnus of the prestigious Asian College of Journalism (ACJ), Chennai, confirming his formal training and commitment to rigorous journalistic standards. Alok Deshpande's rare combination of scientific education, non-profit sector experience, and deep political reporting makes him a highly trusted and authoritative voice on the governance and ground realities of Maharashtra. He tweets @alokdesh ... Read More

Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram