Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram

Of course Guy Ritchies Sherlock Holmes celebrates the crackling chemistry between its two male protagonists. It has a petulant Holmes dismissing Watsons decision to move out of 221 B Baker Street to make a home with his fiancé. It has an exasperated Watson trying to reason with Holmes,who has decided that he doesnt approve of the match. They stare intently into each others eyes and make it very clear to the audience thatbehind the flakey demeanour lies genuine feelings. But why exactly is that a surprise? Why does the media insist on calling this Guy Ritchie film a bromance (a new-age term for a romantic relationship between heterosexual men)?
Any admirer of Arthur Conan Doyles books will tell you that he never shied away from hinting at that the leading men of his celebrated franchise were involved in what can be interpreted as masochistic (but entirely platonic) relationship. In his stories he has repeatedly defined Holmes as a person with a cold,but admirably balanced mind. Holmes never spoke of softer passions,save with a gibe or a sneer,he loathed every form of society but when it came to Watson,he made an exception. Even after they stopped sharing their flat at 221 B,Baker Street,Holmes was always glad to receive his company and eagerly looked forward to his visits.
The point is,Ritchie,uses both Holmes and Law as symbols of virility. They are hot-blooded young men (one of whom alternates between cocaine and ambition,of course) who dont make any bones about surrendering to their passions. With so much testosterone flying about,there is bound to be chemistry. Bromance did you say? Whatever.
Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram