skip to content
Advertisement
Premium

Punjab: Lifer in murder case walks free 20 years later as court acquits him

HC: Role in crime did not establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt; mere provocation cannot be a ground for conviction

punjab and haryana high courtThe case arose from an FIR registered at Sadar Fazilka police station on February 8, 2001, regarding the shooting of one Bhagwan Singh (Archives)

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has acquitted a man convicted of murder in 2005 and sentenced to life imprisonment, holding that his role in the crime did not establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

A division bench of Justices Gurvinder Singh Gill and Jasjit Singh Bedi passed the verdict in an appeal challenging the 2005 judgment of the Ferozepur sessions court, which had found Shanku and his co-accused, Balbir Singh, guilty of murder under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the IPC. The case arose from an FIR registered at Sadar Fazilka police station on February 8, 2001, regarding the shooting of one Bhagwan Singh.

The prosecution had alleged that Shanku, along with other accused, attacked the victim’s family following a dispute over children playing with marbles. According to the prosecution, while co-accused Jagir Singh fired the fatal shot, Shanku had allegedly exhorted him to do so.

Story continues below this ad

During the trial, Jagir Singh passed away, and the proceedings against him were abated. Balbir Singh also died during the pendency of the appeal, leaving only Shanku’s conviction to be examined by the high court.

The court found that Shanku was merely accused of provoking a fellow convict but did not inflict any injury himself. “It will also be debatable as to whether Jagir Singh, aged about 60 years, who was carrying his licensed gun and who had fired the fatal shot, actually fired the shot pursuant to the exhortation by the appellant only,” the judgment stated.

The court also observed that in cases involving multiple accused, there is often an attempt to falsely implicate family members. “The courts have to be extra cautious to rule out the possibility of false implication, particularly when it is a case of a single injury only,” the bench noted.

Given the lack of direct evidence against Shanku and his role being limited to an alleged verbal provocation, the court set aside his conviction, stating that he was “entitled to the benefit of doubt.” It ordered that he be acquitted of all charges and that the necessary intimation be sent to the authorities concerned.

Story continues below this ad

Shanku was represented by amicus curiae Sukhcharan Singh Gill, while the state was represented by additional advocate general Harkanwar Jeet Singh.

Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement

You May Like

Advertisement
Advertisement