Journalism of Courage
Advertisement
Premium

Chhatwal’s plea against rejection of nomination: Punjab and Haryana HC refuses to interfere with Returning Officer’s decision

On April 30, the Returning Officer of Chandigarh parliamentary constituency, during the scrutiny process, rejected the nomination papers of Chhatwal after he could not produce certified copy of electoral roll.

punjab and haryana high court, chandigarh, amritsar dcp, high court amritsar DCP, parampal singh, amritsar dcp parampal singh, dcp parampal singh amritsar, parampal singh high court, criminal proceedings dcp amritsar, former amritsar dcp, former amritsar dcp punjab and haryana high court, punjab and haryana high court former dcp amritsar, Shiromani akali dal, akali dal, akali dal leader mukhjit singh mukha, dcp amritsar disappearance of evidence, indian express news Punjab and Haryana High Court.punjab haryana high court

THE PUNJAB and Haryana High Court, Wednesday, declined to interfere with Chandigarh Returning Officer’s decision to reject nomination papers of independent candidate from Chandigarh seat, Paramjit Singh Chhatwal, after it was found that he was not a registered voter.

The division bench of Justices Daya Chaudhary and Sudhir Mittal, at the outset made it clear to the counsel representing Chhatwal, that it cannot direct the EC to accept his nomination papers at this stage as it would amount to interference in the polling process.

“You should have woken up earlier… A person contesting elections does not know…,” observed the bench regarding Chhatwal’s missing name in the electoral roll. The court further observed, “You have not approached the appropriate forum. Your nomination cannot be accepted at this stage”.

On April 30, the Returning Officer of Chandigarh parliamentary constituency, during the scrutiny process, rejected the nomination papers of Chhatwal after he could not produce certified copy of electoral roll.

While he had contended that he was issued a valid voter card in 1994, which should be considered for the purpose, the Returning Officer in the order said the voter details mentioned in the i-card were not found to be in the existing electoral roll.

The Election Tehsildar found that the candidate was not a voter.

The UT Chandigarh Chief Electoral Officer Ajoy

Kumar Sinha also, on Monday, rejected Chhatwal’s appeal filed againt rejection of his nomination papers by the Returning Officer.

Story continues below this ad

“The perusal of Section 24 of Representation of the Peoples Act, 1950, makes it clear that the appeal against rejection of nomination papers by the Returning Officer cannot be filed under this section. Therefore, the present appeal is not maintainable before this authority and is hereby rejected,” Sinha had stated at the time of the order.

Curated For You

Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram

Tags:
  • Punjab & Haryana High Court
Edition
Install the Express App for
a better experience
Featured
Trending Topics
News
Multimedia
Follow Us
Express OpinionThe Donald Trump magic is past its heyday
X