Premium
This is an archive article published on April 1, 2010

CEOs evade meltdown blame

The pay packets of CEOs have fallen barely at all in 2009,says a report

The global financial crisis may just not have happened. Or perhaps,the Martians should shoulder the blame,if not the innocent public at large.

That at least is the message being sent out by the global corporates.

Compensations received by the CEOs of US companies declined marginally in 2009,amid public uproar over big pay packages,says a media report.

As per the study of CEOs of 200 major US companies,the median compensation fell marginally by 0.9 per cent to USD 6.95 million in 2009,the Wall Street Journal said,citing an analysis by Hay Group management consultancy.

The median compensation consists of value of salaries,bonuses,long-term incentives,and grant of stock and stock options received by the chief executives.

The report said it was only the third time since 1989 that the total direct compensation has fallen for the US chief executives,the report said. While in 2008,pay of CEOs fell 3.4 per cent.

The analysis also showed that highly paid CEOs generally run companies that deliver better-than-average shareholder returns.

According to the publication,decline in 2009

Story continues below this ad

compensation reflected the recession,government controls and continued public outcry over big pay packages. Long-term incentive awards,mostly stock and stock options,were the hardest hit,falling 4.6 per cent to a median USD 5 million.

Median means half the CEOs made more and half made less.

Salaries and bonuses rose 3.2 per cent to USD 2.64 million.

As the recession deepened in late 2008,”many boards lowered targets for 2009¿and so some CEOs collected bonuses even as profits declined,” the report said quoting Irv Becker,head of Hay’s US executive-compensation practice.

 

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement