Premium
This is an archive article published on August 25, 2016

Madras High Court: No TET required for teachers of minority institutions

A division bench of Justices Huluvadi G Ramesh and M V Muralidaran referred to Article 30 of the Constitution which confers right to religious minorities to establish and administer educational institutions

The court said the government cannot insist on the minority institutions, both aided and unaided, to abide by any regulation framed under the provisions of the RTE Act

The Madras High Court has ruled that the order of the governments of Tamil Nadu and Puducherry making it mandatory for aspirants to clear Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) before appointment will not be applicable to minority institutions, either aided or unaided.

A division bench of Justices Huluvadi G Ramesh and M V Muralidaran referred to Article 30 of the Constitution which confers right to religious minorities to establish and administer educational institutions.

Also, the Supreme Court’s decision in Pramati Educational and Cultural Trust case that kept minority institutions outside the purview of RTE Act was cited by the bench in support of its decision.

Story continues below this ad

“We have no hesitation in holding that the right conferred under Article 30(1) of the Constitution cannot be abrogated,” the court ruled, adding as a consequence, the Government Orders (GOs) of both Tamil Nadu and Puducherry which make passing TET mandatory for candidates cannot be applicable to the minority institutions.

“In the light of the above, we are of the view that the government cannot insist on the minority institutions, both aided and unaided, to abide by any regulation framed under the provisions of the RTE Act.”

The ruling came on writ appeals filed by the two governments and over 300 writ petitions challenging the GOs making passing TET mandatory for teachers’ appointment in schools.

ViewPHOTOS: Top government jobs to apply in 2016

Senior counsel for schools said that when the Tamil Nadu Recognised Private Schools (Regulation) Act, 1973 was still in force, it cannot be supplanted by an executive order.

Story continues below this ad

The respondents in the appeals are working as teachers in the minority schools who were appointed against sanctioned posts. When the minority schools sought approval of such appointments, the authorities rejected their proposal on the ground that the teachers had not cleared the TET.

For more news on education, click here

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement