Premium
This is an archive article published on August 1, 2024

Nitish ‘vindicated’: JD(U) hails SC verdict on sub-classification; RJD calls it ‘contradictory’

In 2008, Nitish categorised SCs into Dalit and Mahadalit groups to ensure implementation of welfare schemes based on levels of their discrimination, poverty and social position

Nitish kumarSince 2008, the JD(U) has been rolling out over a dozen welfare schemes, skill development and education programmes for Mahadalits. (File)

For the Nitish Kumar-led Janata Dal (United), which is the first government in the country to conduct and publish a comprehensive caste survey, the Supreme Court’s verdict Thursday allowing the sub-classification of the Scheduled Castes (SC) and the Scheduled Tribes (STs) comes as an endorsement of its party line.

Much before the caste survey, which was conducted in 2023, Kumar had in 2008 categorised the SCs into two groups: Dalits and Mahadalits.

This was done to ensure the implementation of the welfare schemes meant for the SCs based on the levels of their discrimination, poverty and social position.

Story continues below this ad

As per this categorisation, the Dalit group includes Paswans, while the Mahadalit category, considered to be more disadvantaged, has 21 SC groups under it.

Since 2008, the JD(U) has been rolling out over a dozen welfare schemes, skill development and education programmes for Mahadalits.

With the SC judgement Thursday, it remains to be seen if a division of reservation benefits between different SC groups will take place.

Welcoming the apex court’s ruling, JD (U) advisor and national spokesperson K C Tyagi told The Indian Express: “Bihar is one state where we have the Other Backward Caste (OBC)-Economically Backward Caste (EBC) categorisation. Nitish Kumar categorised SC quota among Dalits and Mahadalits to take government benefits to the poorest of the poor. Now, it is up to the state government to work on how to break down the quota. In a sense, Nitish Kumar has become a champion of caste sub-categorisation. He faced a lot of criticism over the nomenclature of Mahadalits. But he stands vindicated.”

Story continues below this ad

Tyagi added that the JD(U) is now looking forward to Justice G Rohini Commission’s report on the sub-categorisation of OBCs.

RJD national spokesperson Subodh Kumar Mehta, however, called the top court’s verdict “contradictory”.

“As per the Constituent Assembly debates, the issue of sub-categorisation was settled and not included in the Constitution. However, today’s verdict suggests that this sub-categorisation is an artificial insertion by the judiciary. Article 341, which empowers the President to declare certain castes and classes as SCs in a state or Union Territory, can only be altered by a presidential order. This means that states do not have the power to interfere with or disturb this list, including through sub-classification. But what the verdict does is to further lend credence and weight to our long-pending demand of nationwide caste census,” said Mehta.

A state BJP leader said the party unit was still waiting to “understand the verdict”. “Though we know that we had supported the concept of Mahadalits and also the Bihar caste survey, we would have to see how the SC verdict translates on ground,” he said.

Story continues below this ad

As per the Bihar caste caste survey, SCs constitute 19.65% of Bihar’s population. The community has a 16% allotted quota in the state, which is currently divided between Dalits and Mahadalits.

The total reservation pie in the state currently stands at 50% – including 18% for EBCs, 16% for SCs, 12% OBCs, 3% for OBC women and 1% for STs – besides 10% for EWS (Economically Weaker Sections).

Santosh Singh is a Senior Assistant Editor with The Indian Express since June 2008. He covers Bihar with main focus on politics, society and governance. Investigative and explanatory stories are also his forte. Singh has 25 years of experience in print journalism covering Bihar, Delhi, Madhya Pradesh and Karnataka.   ... Read More

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement