Premium
This is an archive article published on July 16, 2010
Premium

Opinion Whither Kashmir?

Complicated,and working with multiple ideological considerations,Kashmir’s politics has made genuine dialogue and socio-political progress almost impossible....

The Indian Express

July 16, 2010 03:09 AM IST First published on: Jul 16, 2010 at 03:09 AM IST

This refers to Pratap B. Mehta’s ‘Stones and silence’ (IE,July 15). Complicated,and working with multiple ideological considerations,Kashmir’s politics has made genuine dialogue and socio-political progress almost impossible. It now appears that periodic violence,perpetual suspicion,demands for freedoms and status,and political interventions,have become routine. Now even the state of limbo is being taken as the only practical possibility even though it keeps eroding the political credibility of the ruling class.

The predictable political rhetoric may satisfy certain sections of the people but do we realise the backwardness — social,economic,political — which an ordinary Kashmiri is being pushed into? Do we understand that our political class,given its habit of “passing the buck”,has turned into a practical hell what was once known and loved as “heaven on earth”?

— Ved Guliani Hisar

Wider angles

Advertisement

Najeeb Jung’s ‘The need for nuance’ (IE,July 14),while rightly forewarning of an increased influence of “jihadi escalation” in Kashmir,has missed the larger struggle. Stone-pelting Kashmiri youth were perhaps not bona fide aggrieved people,but as intelligence reports indicate — and as reported by a section of the media — they were perhaps acting at the behest of people from across the border. As Ira Lapidus in his excellent study of medieval society has shown,sometimes the mob becomes a substitute for civil society; the present turmoil in the Valley seems to confirm that. Secessionist and anti-India slogans raised and exhortations from certain quarters would further prove that the comparison between David and Goliath might be misleading. Hence the use of the term “intifida” looks misplaced.

— Saradindu Mukherji

Delhi

Stifling vox populi

The editorial ‘The land of chup’ (IE,July 14) was apt and informative. The Supreme Court has rightly lifted the ban imposed by Maharashtra on James Laine’s book. Politicians lose no opportunity to cash in on the parochialism that has bedevilled the state. Banning a book is a blatant violation of the freedom of expression. Asking the for an apology from Maharashtra’s home minister,R.R. Patil,for the government’s “failure” to defend Shivaji’s honour is unjustified in the wake of the SC ruling. Even the idea of enacting a law to “prevent the defamation of iconic personalities” can be seen as an attempt to gag the people.

— R.K. Kapoor Chandigarh

Adrift in Mumbai

The editorial ‘State of drift’ (IE,July 15) amply describes the worsening standards of politics in Maharashtra. The Shiv Sena-MNS rivalry,which split Marathi votes,had immensely benefited the Congress. But now,matching the Senas’ vitriolic rhetoric is taking its toll on the Congress. To browbeat them,the Congress is playing into the hands of regional parties and acting on their agenda.

— Ashok Goswami

Mumbai

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments