skip to content
Premium
This is an archive article published on September 9, 2023
Premium

Opinion E P Unny’s tribute to Ajit Ninan: A Master of Irreverence

Ajit Ninan’s cartoons showed the pious and pompous as eminently laughable

Ajit NinanAjit Ninan was a master at blurring the needless distinction between cartoons and comics.
indianexpress

EP Unny

September 9, 2023 09:36 AM IST First published on: Sep 9, 2023 at 07:20 AM IST

Ajit Ninan was the bright new face that emerged after the long eclipse of the Indian cartoon in the mid-1970s. The press censorship that came with the Emergency in 1975 had hit cartoonists the hardest. There was no way you could keep doing cartoon after safe cartoon to convince the censoring official, who in those days was either a reluctant Nehruvian or an overzealous Sanjay Gandhian. The result was that cartoons were censored, which was bad enough. That it was done with no rhyme or reason was worse.

The first casualty of the Emergency was Shankar’s Weekly, the country’s best-read political satire magazine. It folded up in September 1975 within months of the declaration of Emergency. Even after the regime was voted out in 1977, and despite the revenge media boom that followed, there was no new Shankar to promote a wide-reaching cartoon periodical.

Advertisement

The closest dose of irreverence that then came periodically was thanks to Ajit Ninan in India Today. Ajit single-handedly filled the pages of the political journal with a rich fare of national comedy, amply aided by the chaotic Janata coalition that succeeded Indira Gandhi. No government helped cartoonists more. Cacophony seldom translated better into comics. Ajit loved it. He was a master at blurring the needless distinction between cartoons and comics.

He caricatured serious political personalities for grown-ups in the same spirit in which he created his own fictional character, Detective Moochwallah, for children. This was unstated levelling and inherent irreverence. Not every comic illustration of his in India Today cried out like a punchy stand-alone cartoon. Instead, he took you across sumptuous imagery that worked like modern-day murals to show the pious and the pompous as eminently laughable.  

He was also happily free from the tyranny of text, a luxury his newspaper peers could only envy. His drawings in India Today were part of the written article that explained the context. He could freewheel and reach out to readers who read as well as those who didn’t bother to read. In hotel lobbies and at airports, you would see people simply gazing at his cartoon and chuckling. Even when he migrated to daily news-cartooning at The Indian Express and The Times of India, he didn’t quite give up this urge to visualise more than textualise.

Advertisement

Ajit made the clearest departure from a certain minimalist approach that marked early Indian cartooning down to his uncle, the illustrious Abu Abraham’s work. From the British news-cartoon mode, it was a visual leap into the Mad magazine mode. This would have been blasphemous in any Supreme Leader era. Mercifully, Indian politics has had breathing spaces that came and went before leaders gained much self-importance. The collective leadership that reigns in these phases typically throws up a range of faces and forms. In one such, when Chandra Shekhar, the most visibly bearded neta around at that time, was joined by a no less bearded Ramakrishna Hegde, Ajit exclaimed, “What a pain!” and promptly sat down to treat the bristles with precise distinction.

His was a drawing rich in detail and colour that printed well on quality paper. A far cry from the kind of flimsy newsprint on which some of the country’s best cartoonists were printed for decades. Thanks to this and the generous display, his work was seen nation-wide. He became the most imitated cartoonist next only to RK Laxman. Like Laxman and Mario Miranda, he was among the few Indian cartoonists to do promotional work for commercial brands.

When he migrated to Outlook and then to The Times of India, his characteristic style stood out through the technological sweep in the newsroom. Quick to adapt to computer graphics and digital devices, he must easily have been the first among us to discard the idea of an original drawing. There were many who sought an original from him and they would be surprised to receive a series of computer prints that added up in layers to the final cartoon output. Despite all the tech he assimilated, that unmistakable hand-done drawing remained. Few packaged the cartoon better and few retained its organic flavour.

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Edition
Install the Express App for
a better experience
Featured
Trending Topics
News
Multimedia
Follow Us