Mix and match

The university campus favours interdisciplinary cross-fertilisation. Perhaps one of the original motives for gathering together colleges specialising in diverse disciplines,and locating them on a single campus,was to encourage the branches of human knowledge to step out of their comfort zones and see how the other half lives. However,this ideal has been compromised through the 20th century,in which disciplines have become specialised and attenuated to the point that conversation with other disciplines becomes difficult if not improbable. At the same time,disciplines with immediate utility,such as chemistry and engineering,have been valorised over subjects whose utility is long-term and unpredictable,creating a caste system on campus. The geneticist is valued over the sociologist and the computer scientist over the linguist. Creativity has been the casualty.

DUs proposed renaming of its science degree to BTech appears to perpetuate this division by utility,suggesting that technology is more valuable or monetisable than science. But the tilt towards multi-disciplinary exposure is welcome. Interdisciplinary work is not promoted enough and,frequently,it is really mathematical modelling by another name. The success of mathematics in this role indicates how valuable interdisciplinary work can be. The extent to which it is embedded in economics could not have been anticipated 50 years ago and 20 years from now,it could be as important for the life sciences. A model for higher education that offers exposure across multiple streams of knowledge will produce unpredictable but substantial benefits in future.

Curated For You

US travel ban on 39 countries comes into effect on January 1, 2026: A full list

Video of woman constable being stripped during violent Chhattisgarh anti-mining protest sparks outrage, 2 arrested

SRK in line of BJP, Senas fire after KKR signs Bangladesh player