Premium
This is an archive article published on July 12, 2000

The great divide

The Centre may have nipped the demand for autonomy in the bud, but the controversial report adopted by the Jammu and Kashmir Legislative A...

.

The Centre may have nipped the demand for autonomy in the bud, but the controversial report adopted by the Jammu and Kashmir Legislative Assembly has already generated a fast-growing backlash within the state. The communal agenda of trifurcating Jammu and Kashmir is top of the mind, and some groups are even speaking the language of partition.

The Congress-leaning Ladakh Hill Development Council passed a resolution seeking separation from Jamp;K and a Union Territory status for Buddhist-dominated Leh. The Bhartiya Janata Party has openly threatened to pursue an agitation for trifurcation if the Centre even discusses the autonomy demand. Several political parties with a base in the Hindu-dominated areas of Jammu, such as the Panthers Party, have suggested statehood for Jammu or a complete merger with the Indian Union. The right-wing Kashmiri Pandit group, Panun Kashmir, even demands further partition of the state, seeking a separate homeland for the community in the Kashmir valley directly controlled by Delhi.

8220;Autonomy means independence. It is an anti-national act and we condemn it,8221; declares Shri Kumar, the RSS chief of Jamp;K. He claimed that the demand for separate statehood for Jammu and union territory status for Ladakh was a reaction to the ruling NC8217;s autonomy demand. Kumar said his party would support all those fighting against autonomy. 8220;We have sacrificed so many precious lives, including our hero Dr Shyama Prasad Mukherjee, to achieve integration with the country, we will not allow it to happen at any cost,8221; he said.

Though the restoration of autonomy seems a distant dream, the reactions generated on communal lines is likely to strengthen hardliner groups which are advocating the two nation theory. Ironically, the stand taken by the right-wing Hindu groups echoes that of their Muslim adversaries in the separatist camp.

Syed Ali Shah Geelani, Senior Jamaat-e-Islami leader and chairperson of the All Parties Hurriyat Conference, openly advocated division of the state if necessary, to reach a permanent settlement.

The BJP Vice president in Jamp;K, Chander Mohan Sharma, accused Chief Minister Farooq Abdullah of 8220;hobnobbing with foreign agencies to disintegrate the country8221;. He even claimed that Abdullah had sent a copy of the Autonomy Report to US officials before tabling it in the assembly. In a recent press briefing, he called the report a 8220;document of secession8221; and threatened that Jammuites would be forced to launch an agitation for trifurcation.

The autonomy debate is now so neck-deep in communalism that the ruling National Conference has started reacting in the same language. Conference leaders from the Muslim-dominated belts of Jammu and Kargil in Ladakh openly warn of further division of their regions on communal lines if the opposition demands trifurcation. 8220;We are against any division of the state and will fight to prevent it. But if the division is inevitable, we would rather be a part of Kashmir than Jammu,8221; said the NC legislator from Doda, Khalid Najeeb Suharwardy.

Story continues below this ad

Another legislator from nearby Bhaderwah has similar views. 8220;The BJP is not the majority voice in Jammu. In fact Kanak Mandi a small, BJP-dominated area is not Jammu,8221; said Firdous Sayeed Baba. A pro-Pakistan militant commander-turned-legislator, Baba says any settlement on religious lines would be disastrous not only for the state but for the whole of the sub-continent. 8220;It8217;s like playing with fire. The events of 1947 will get re-enacted in every village,8221; he warned.

Things are no different in Ladakh. There were protests against the demand for autonomy in Buddhist dominated Leh, where the Ladakh Hill Development Council adopted a resolution calling for separation from Jamp;K and seeking union territory status to come under Delhi8217;s direct rule. The NC termed this move illegal and questioned the hill council8217;s jurisdiction. 8220;The so-called resolution has no legal standing. This hill council has only a developmental mandate,8221; said P L Handoo, State Law minister. 8220;If the Srinagar municipality passes a resolution tomorrow that Srinagar is a part of Pakistan, who will accept it?8221;

But the Executive Councillor and spokesperson of the LHDC, Rigzin Jora, said their resolution reflects the popular sentiment of Ladakhis. 8220;We8217;re sure that if the Jamp;K government gets autonomy and more powers, they will throw us away like the Kashmiri Pandits,8221; he said. But isn8217;t their move to have a separate union territory for the Buddhist-dominated area communally motivated? According to Jora, Farooq Abdullah himself initiated this sentiment by dividing the state into eight regions in his regional autonomy plan. The Ladakh Buddhist Association LBA is continuing its agitation for union territory Status despite the Centre8217;s rejection of autonomy. Jora explained: 8220;We know that sooner or later, the Centre has to resolve the problems in Kashmir. We are not against autonomy to the Kashmir Valley, but it should not be binding on us. Our aspirations should also be taken into consideration.8221;

The Junior Works minister and NC legislator representing Kargil, Qamar Ali Akhoon, claims that the demand for a union territory on communal lines was a Congress game plan. 8220;The LBA is nothing but a front for the Congress,8221; he said.

Story continues below this ad

Pradesh Congress president, M S Qureshi, agrees that states deserve more powers but is uncomfortable with autonomy to Jamp;K. 8220;We are not for autonomy that results in total regimentation,8221; he said. His party8217;s position is to discuss matters only within the parameters of the Sheikh-Indira accord of 1975. 8220;If Farooq Abdullah wants to nullify that accord, let him openly say that his father was wrong and was taken in,8221; Qureshi said.

Readers can send feedback to focusexpressindia.com

Muzamil Jaleel is a Deputy Editor at The Indian Express and is widely recognized as one of India’s most authoritative voices on Jammu & Kashmir, national security, and internal affairs. With a career spanning over 30 years, he has provided definitive on-the-ground reportage from the heart of the Kashmir conflict, bearing witness to historic political transitions and constitutional shifts. Expertise and Investigative Depth Muzamil’s work is characterized by a rare combination of ground-level immersion and high-level constitutional analysis. His expertise includes: Conflict & Geopolitics: Decades of reporting on the evolution of the Kashmir conflict, the Indo-Pak peace process, and the socio-political dynamics of the Himalayan region. Constitutional Law: Deep-dive analysis of Article 370 and Article 35A, providing clarity on the legal and demographic implications of their abrogation in 2019. Human Rights & Accountability: A relentless investigator of state and non-state actors, uncovering systemic abuses including fake encounters and the custodial death of political workers. International War Reporting: Beyond South Asia, he provided on-the-spot coverage of the final, decisive phase of the Sri Lankan Civil War in 2009. Landmark Exposés & Impact Muzamil’s reporting has repeatedly forced institutional accountability and shaped national discourse: The Kashmir Sex Scandal (2006): His investigative series exposed a high-profile exploitation nexus involving top politicians, bureaucrats, and police officers, leading to the sacking and arrest of several senior officials. Fake Encounters: His reports blew the lid off cases where innocent civilians were passed off as "foreign terrorists" by security forces for gallantry awards. SIMI Investigations: He conducted a massive deep-dive into the arrests of SIMI members, using public records to show how innocuous religious gatherings were often labeled as incriminating activities by investigative agencies. The Amarnath Land Row: Provided critical context to the 2008 agitation that polarized the region and altered its political trajectory. Over the years, Muzamil has also covered 2002 Gujarat riots, Bhuj earthquake, assembly elections in Bihar for Indian Express. He has also reported the peace process in Northern Ireland, war in Sri Lanka and national elections in Pakistan for the paper. Awards and Fellowships His "Journalism of Courage" has been honored with the industry's most prestigious accolades: Four Ramnath Goenka Awards: Recognized for J&K Reportage (2007), On-the-Spot Reporting (2009), and Reporting on Politics and Government (2012, 2017). Kurt Schork Award: From Columbia University for international journalism. Sanskriti Award: For excellence in Indian journalism and literature. IFJ Tolerance Prize: For his empathetic and nuanced reporting in South Asia. International Fellowships: Served as a visiting scholar at UC Berkeley and worked with The Guardian, The Observer, and The Times in London. He has also received Chevening fellowship and a fellowship at the Institute of Social Studies, Hague, Netherlands. Professional Presence Current Location: New Delhi (formerly Bureau Chief, Srinagar). Education: Master’s in Journalism from Kashmir University. Social Media: Follow him for field insights and rigorous analysis on X (Twitter) @MuzamilJALEEL. ... Read More

 

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement