Premium
This is an archive article published on August 14, 1998

Spods go ballistic over a dumbed down 3-kg NODE

LONDON, August 13: The New Oxford Dictionary of English (NODE), published today, has purists screaming that it is a `dumbed down' version...

.

LONDON, August 13: The New Oxford Dictionary of English (NODE), published today, has purists screaming that it is a `dumbed down’ version of the Oxford English dictionary. (“Dumbing something down: Simplify or reduce the intellectual content of something to make it accessible to a larger number of people.”). The dictionary’s editors have, however, effectively told linguistic `spods’ (dull over-studious persons) to take a `reality check’. They say that the dictionary, the first to be written from scratch in more than 70 years, presents English as a “living language”. The dictionary, according to its publishers Oxford University Press (OUP) shows “… how the words are really used – not just their formal meanings.”

The NODE has 3,50,000 words and weighs over 3 kg. OUP says, it has consulted 30 editors and 60 consultants from across the world, spent $ 5 million and taken over six years to create it. The dictionary’s compilers used a database of 200 million words. Advanced computers allowed them to scan20 years worth of reading in seconds, to see exactly what a word means and how it is used. The end result is that you can now officially have `snuked’ a look instead of having `sneaked’ a look.

You can get the `full monty’ (get the full amount), speak mockney (a form of speech perceived as an affected imitation of cockney), or be a `mouse potato’ (a person who spends large amounts of leisure or working time operating a computer). You may also be a `saddo’ (a person perceived as contemptible or pathetically inadequate) in which case you are liable to have `phone sex’ (a commercial service providing its customers with sexually explicit telephone conversation for the purpose of sexual gratification) and say `phwaoh’ or `phwoor’! (Brit informal) used to express desire especially of sexual nature).

Story continues below this ad

The impact of New Labour on the English language is clearly important. `Blairite’ makes it into the dictionary (a follower of British Prime Minister Tony Blair). The all-important `spin doctor’ and his bug-bears -`on-message’ and `off-message’ (referring to those who adhere to, or depart from, the government line) are also included.

The dictionary underlines politically correct usage, declaring the term `Christian name’ to be obsolete. It says that preferred usage – `first name’ or `give name’ – recognise “that English-speaking societies have many religions and cultures”. The dictionary’s editors advise English speakers to avoid using, among others, Eskimo (and instead say Inuit) `poetess’ or `authoress’ (poet or author), spinster, Asiatic, chairman and cripple.The dictionary also finds room for gay slang originating in the United States. A `beard’ for instance is a female escorting a gay man in order to hide his homosexuality, while a `breeder’ is a gay term for a heterosexual. From sport, the `golden goal’ – the first winning goal scored in extra time – is also included. The editors have also acknowledged the influence of other influences in the way English is spoken, accepting that the use pronunciation of`research’ or harass and `harassment’ with the emphasis on the first syllable (rather than the traditional British emphasis on the second syllable) is acceptable.

What has, however, made purists `go ballistic’ (become violently angry) is not so much the inclusion of new words, but the `revolutionary’ view of grammar.

The dictionary’s editor says that Captain Kirk’s mission statement “to boldly go where no man has gone before” is perfectly grammatical. In standard English, they say, the split infinitive is `broadly accepted as normal and useful”. Rather more controversially they suggest that it is preferable to use `they’ instead of `he’ or `she’ when referring to an individual of unspecified sex. The dictionary describes the use of `he’ in these circumstances as “old-fashioned and sexist” and says that the politically correct usage “he or she” is `tiresomely long-winded.”

Story continues below this ad

The Queen’s English Society has called for an English Academy to be set up along the lines of the Academie Francaise toprotect the purity of the language. One patron said, “The Oxford University Press is very powerful. If it is going to say this kind of thing, goodness knows what is going to happen to the English language.”

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement