Sadly,not many cricketers believe that being likeable is important

At the check out counter at our hotel in St Lucia,a fairly dignified lady came to say hello and ask politely if she could have a photograph....

At the check out counter at our hotel in St Lucia,a fairly dignified lady came to say hello and ask politely if she could have a photograph. And then,in passing,asked why our cricketers were so arrogant. All I wanted was an autograph and a photograph for my kid,but they were so arrogant? It wasnt the first time I had heard the line and I mumbled something about there being a lot of fans but neither she nor I was convinced of my reply.

Meanwhile in the bar of our hotel in Barbados a loud,overbearing group of Indian fans were making conversation difficult for everyone else; not just because they were loud but because they kept interrupting everybody. As they got high,and increasingly insufferable,they began accosting some of the West Indian cricketers. It was a good time to leave.

So,here are two different images of the Indian fan. I have little doubt that the group the Indian cricketers encountered in St Lucia after their defeat belonged to the second category. But while people will do what they must,it raises interesting questions about the relationship between cricketers and fans. The cricketers believe fans are overbearing,the fans find them arrogant.

Story continues below this ad

Many spectators,and viewers,believe,and this is a point often made in this column,that they are the genuine stakeholders of Indian cricket; that if they didn’t watch,there would be no money and maybe,no game. The counter to that would be: what does buying a ticket or watching a game entitle you to? The action as a match unfolds? The excitement and drama that only live sport can provide? Or more? A slice of a player’s life?

Conversely,are players expected to acknowledge that their livelihood comes,either directly or otherwise,from the people who watch them play? And that therefore,they should be polite,dignified and likeable in their company? And very patient? But then shouldnt fans be reasonable? Can’t they wait,for example,before dinner is complete before barging in and insisting on a photograph?

I suspect,like with most things,both camps have a point. I do believe though that buying a ticket entitles you to no more than the action you have paid for. And like with the movies,sometimes you get to see a hit and sometimes a flop. I cannot,Im afraid,subscribe to the view that I have often heard Weve come so far and look what they did? as if to say that because they have travelled the distance the player is beholden to do well. I heard a lot of that in the West Indies. Sadly it was often followed by derogatory remarks,inevitably unproven,about players and their habits.

The players too need to realize that this is part of the deal they buy into when they enter the world of international sport. And that being polite doesnt cost too much. I have seen Tendulkar and Dravid and Kumble do it very well. Over time you know which fan to avoid,which one to smile at,which autograph to sign and when to pause for a photograph. Scribbling an autograph without even looking at a person,for example,is rude. It is far easier to say sorry,but Im in a hurry.

Story continues below this ad

Sadly not many cricketers believe that being likeable is important. Sure they are there to play cricket,to win matches and not to win popularity contests,but they also represent a team and a country. And I think they will discover that being likeable is not too difficult,nor is too bad for their brand value. All successful brands,and that includes people brands,eventually need to be likeable and I hope someone tells our young cricketers that. Aamir and Shahrukh will always be bigger brands than Salman Khan because of the way they carry themselves. Ditto with Tendulkar and Dravid.

I suspect,in course of time,this love-hate relationship will extend to that between a player and the media; especially if the media is as fickle and sensationalist as it has now become. Aggressive,sometimes untruthful,reporting actually spurs the fans on and I very seriously fear that large sections of the media are abdicating their responsibility towards being balanced and truthful which is really a journalists Hippocratic Oath.

To be honest I dont see a solution in sight. It could lie in educating the players of their responsibilities,in the media realizing that ratings are fine for movies but dangerous for news and for spectators in not going overboard either way.

But I wouldnt bet on that happening!