
The story of United Flight 93, more than any other tale of our times, makes you wonder about yourself. These were not young soldiers in battle. This was not the culmination of some long crisis with time to ruminate and firm up your resolve. These were ordinary, middle-class and mostly middle-aged Americans going about their everyday lives, when 8212; bang! 8212; they faced the ultimate test. And passed. 8220;Once to every man and nation comes the moment to decide,8221; goes the old hymn. But usually it8217;s not literally just a moment. These people were not just courageous. They were instinctually courageous.
I think I8217;d flunk. Oh, perhaps optimistically, I give myself a 50-50 chance of having the courage to rise from my seat and join a charge toward the cockpit. What I find harder to imagine is disobeying the instructions from authority figures 8212; flight attendants, anonymous voices over the public address system 8212; telling me to stay seated and remain calm.
It is the nature of authorities to assert authority, and it is hard to imagine officials of anything urging people to pay no attention to official instructions. But there is also some logic here. The policies followed at the World Trade Center seem very wrong in hindsight. But these rules themselves were the product of hindsight. During the first World Trade Center bombing, back in 1993, rescue attempts and fire control were frustrated by the anarchy of thousands fleeing unnecessarily down narrow emergency stairs8230;
Courage and cowardice, obeying instructions and defying them, are all unreliable guides in a crisis. In a way, that8217;s comforting. You can8217;t really get it wrong. You8217;re in the hands of fate or faith, if you8217;ve got it. We celebrate the passengers who rebelled on Flight 93 for their choice, but we surely don8217;t, or shouldn8217;t, blame any of the folks on any of those planes for arriving at a different decision, or none at all.
Excerpted from an article by Michael Kinsley in 8216;The Washington Post8217;, May 13