
When 25 judges of the Punjab and Haryana High Court go on mass leave in response to disciplinary action taken against two of their colleagues 8212; who were clearly guilty of judicial impropriety 8212; as they did on Monday, it sends out several alarming signals about the state of the judiciary in that particular high court. Its chief justice has, it appears, been fighting a dogged battle against recurring evidence of apathy and malfeasance in his court, as indeed he should as its chief guardian. Unfortunately, instead of ensuring that he is given their complete cooperation, his brother judges have preferred to perceive these attempts as an attempt to undermine their turf.
Quite literally so, it appears, as the issue that brought about the final stand-off demonstrated. The chief justice had sought an explanation from two judges for having accepted ex-officio membership of a golf club that was itself the subject of litigation since it was allegedly situated on forest land, as this newspaper has reported. If the layperson can easily perceive the rationale behind the chief justice8217;s concern over the image of the judiciary, how much more should the judges themselves have done so? Their decision then to go on mass leave 8212; which can only be interpreted as a move to protest the chief justice8217;s attempts at self-regulation 8212; speaks poorly of their commitment to uphold the honour and integrity of their calling.