
Is there such a thing as a stupidity gene? A stupidity gene! Well, if there were a stupidity gene, I think it would have to be pretty much eradicated by now8230; unless it keeps springing up with random mutations. Why would that be?
Well, if there were a stupidity gene, the unfortunate owner of the gene would make fatally ignorant decisions more often than average. Therefore, the stupidity gene would be selected against so heavily that it couldn8217;t linger in population for more than a few hundred generations 8230; unless there was a selective pressure that made it desirable in some circumstances.Like?
I was thinking about that. A lot of these stories seem to involve some pretty innovative thinking. Oh yeah!Right. If there are multiple stupidity genes, then having one or two might make someone creative, while having a dozen would make her a dangerous idiot.
For example, the fisherman who electrocuted himself 8230; Yeah. He had a great idea! He connected cables to the main power supply of his house, dropped the other end in the river, waited for a batch of electrocuted fish to float to the surface, and then waded into the water to retrieve his catch.
So what8217;s the difference between the kind of risk-taking that leads to great innovation, and the kind that leads to a humiliating demise? The difference seems to be the decoupling of a new idea from an examination of the risks involved. If the risk-taker neglects to consider the deadly consequences, then only luck can save him from an embarrassing outcome. For example, Benjamin Franklin experimented with lightning using a key tied to a kite. I think that story is apocryphal, but it would be a good example of luck saving an innovator from disaster.
Is there aneurological explanation for the phenomenon that allows us to do something really stupid at the exact same moment we8217;re thinking, 8220;This is really stupid?8221;
We can follow several lines of thought in parallel. Once a hypothetical 8220;great idea8221; reaches a critical juncture and begins to trigger a physical response, a parallel cautious line of thought might not be able to interrupt that response before it translates into action. If you8217;ve ever done something stupid, and thought a split-second before tragedy befalls that it might not be such a clever plan, then you8217;ve experienced the effects of parallel mental processing. It8217;s rare for someone to think, 8220;I didn8217;t even see the consequences coming.8221;
This piece by Carina Chocano is excerpted from the online Salon Magazine at salon.com