Premium
This is an archive article published on December 28, 1997

Inside track — Taxing art

As a former finance minister and prime minister, V.P. Singh had no doubt received petitions from artists complaining against high taxation ...

.

As a former finance minister and prime minister, V.P. Singh had no doubt received petitions from artists complaining against high taxation on their work. Now, Singh as a painter himself feels the pinch of the Finance Ministry’s tax structure.

Last week, Singh offered six of his works to Maneka Gandhi’s show `Delhi for Delhi’ for which leading Delhi artists had contributed on the understanding that half the proceeds would go to the People for Animals and the other half to the concerned painter. Singh’s paintings were a hit — one sold for as high as Rs 65,000 — but then Singh discovered that for his share of the proceeds he would still have to pay income tax in the range of 30 to 40 per cent. The former prime minister had second thoughts about selling his paintings. But by then it was too late, four had already been sold. Only the remaining two could be withheld. A day later Singh changed his mind again, he was willing to sell the other two at double the earlier price. But by then the exhibition was over.

Incidentally, the only formal training in painting Singh received was when as a student in Allahabad he learnt painting techniques in the traditional Bengal school of art. He took up painting again after his illness which forced him to quit active politics. Several well-known artists were delighted to offer advice. Singh progressed from realistic sketches of his pet Pomeranian to more sophisticated and abstract art. In his painting, The Downtrodden, which depicts a tortured face, Singh walked over the painting with bare feet to capture the mood. In another work, Singh has drawn Sheila Kini, the Mumbai housewife who accused the Shiv Sena of killing her husband at the behest of their landlord. Though his illness has prevented him from painting in the last year, Singh’s new interest is photography.

Artistic licence

Story continues below this ad

V.P. SINGH’S lieutenant Wasim Ahmed, MP, thought he was doing the organisers at Maneka Gandhi’s `Delhi for Delhi’ art show a great favour by calling the media on the opening day to meet Singh, as if it was a political press conference. As a consequence, the art gallery was taken over by Singh’s SPG guards, the TV cameras and political correspondents who together frightened off legitimate buyers and art lovers. Maneka had to tactfully persuade Singh and the media circus to move to the lawns so that the art show could be salvaged.

The unkindest cut for Maneka was that one TV network showed clips while she was talking to Singh about the show, and made the visuals into a political story, claiming that Singh was mediating between Mulayam Singh Yadav, the BSP and Maneka. In fact, Maneka is hoping to get BJP support for her election in Pilibhit.

Jain junction

While he had earlier indicated that he would wind up his commission by February end, Justice Jain now has second thoughts. He has learnt that the Government is contemplating taking action against the Commission after its term ended for having breached the Official Secrets Act. Jain has made top secret documents public which the Government thought were being shown only to the judge in strictest confidence.

The judge has decided that attack is the best form of defence and has demanded still more classified material, so that he has an excuse to refuse to wind up the commission. In part two of his report, Jain plans to fix Chandraswami. In his first report the only mention of the swami — in spite of all the media stories — is about a newspaper clipping which claims that $ 1 million was paid by the swami’s henchman to a Colombo-based businessman. After six years, the Commission is still trying to verify the truth of the report, even though the address of the Sri Lankan businessman is included in the report.

Over-smart Ajit

Story continues below this ad

Ajit Singh’s political strategy is to switch sides constantly and keep everyone guessing as to who he will ally with next. But in being too clever by half, Ajit has lost out. Ajit convinced the BJP that at some point he would join with them along with other MPs from the Jat heartland of western UP. Which is why in 1996 the BJP put up a weak opponent against Ajit in Chaudhary Charan Singh’s pocket-borough of Baghpat.

But then Ajit convinced himself that his best bet for the forthcoming election was to ally with the RJD since the latter planned to ally with the BSP and hopefully Mulayam’s Samajwadi Party as well. During Kalyan Singh’s crucial confidence motion in the UP assembly, Ajit permanently alienated the UP Chief Minister by refusing support of the Bharatiya Kisan Kamgar Party MLAs. Now, Mayawati has made it clear that she is not tying up with the RJD in UP and Ajit finds himself out in the cold. To add to his woes, Som Pal, whose father was a renowned Arya Samaji leader and Sanskrit scholar, has joined the BJP and is set to challenge Ajit in his once invincible citadel.

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement