History, in Marx8217;s famous dictum, tends to repeat itself: the first time as tragedy and the second time as farce.
3 min read
Whatsapp
Twitter
Facebook
Reddit
History, in Marx8217;s famous dictum, tends to repeat itself: the first time as tragedy and the second time as farce. So what do you call it the third time around? A bad sitcom? A bad marriage? A bad dream? All three8230; seem like viable ways of describing the Democratic Party8217;s current predicament. Even in the annals of Democratic ritual suicide, the 2008 campaign is something special: It8217;s not just that the protracted and painful nomination struggle8230; repeats all the classic themes of intra-Democratic conflict 8212; left vs centre, reformer vs the Establishment, pragmatist vs idealist8230;
8230;Democrats have never been asked to choose quite so nakedly which absolutely necessary demographic they would like to do without8230; Do we want to lose because we drove away blacks or because we drove away white women? Beginning with the debacle of 1968, every Democratic campaign8230; has followed pretty much the same template. The quadrennial conflict between liberals and moderates, outsiders and insiders, let8217;s-win-an-election realists and let8217;s-save-our-party dreamers8230; reflects the fatal uncertainty of a political party that lacks any clear constituency or ideological focus8230; The Democratic Party8217;s unresolved internal struggles have time and again undermined its ability to win elections or to govern effectively.
You’ve Read Your Free Stories For Now
Sign up and keep reading more stories that matter to you.
To get specific, the 2008 Obama-Clinton contest offers eerie echoes of two of the most traumatic8230; campaigns of recent Democratic history. First8230; there8217;s the comparison increasingly drawn8230; between Obama and Sen. George McGovern, who played the paradigm-shaping role of reformist outsider in 1972. Of course it8217;s meant to be a toxic metaphor, suggesting that Obama is a dewy-eyed Pied Piper leading his followers into a November electoral catastrophe. Let8217;s set that silliness aside right now. Whoever the Democrats nominate will not be facing a popular incumbent but an awkward Republican nominee who has embraced an unpopular war and remains unloved by his own party8217;s base. One should never underestimate the Democratic ability to lose elections, but ain8217;t nobody carrying 49 states this fall. This intra-Democratic conflict is profound and epistemological. It speaks to deeply divergent ideas about the nature of politics, of America and indeed of human life. It isn8217;t a battle for the soul of the Democratic Party; it is the Democratic Party.
Excerpted from Andrew O8217;Hehir8217;s 8216;The Haunting of the Democrats8217; in Salon
