Terrorist strikes in Saudi Arabia and by Saudi nationals have been a dominant factor in international terrorism for a number of years 8212;...
3 min read
Whatsapp
Twitter
Facebook
Reddit
Terrorist strikes in Saudi Arabia and by Saudi nationals have been a dominant factor in international terrorism for a number of years 8212; and specifically targeted are the residential and office compounds where foreigners live and work. The terrorist strike on Saturday took nearly 60 persons from various nationalities hostage, out of which as many as nine are believed to have been killed by the terrorists, apparently during the period when the first rescue attempt was made and aborted on Saturday night. A second rescue attempt was made by Saudi commandos at sunrise on Sunday. Full details of the episode in which 22 hostages, including eight Indians, were killed, are yet to filter through but, even so, many questions arise from the tragedy.
The first is the issue of safety and security of the expatriate population in the kingdom, especially in the nerve centre of the Saudi oil industry at Al Khobar. A major strike launched by Al-Qaeda was expected by the US for some days, and an affiliate of the Al-Qaeda has claimed credit for this gruesome attack. As a close ally of the US, Saudi Arabia would have no doubt heightened its security measures. Obviously this has not proved to be either sufficient or effective. While the Al-Qaeda may have been aiming to trigger a further rise in oil prices and increase economic pressures on the US in a presidential election year, the implications of this event that go beyond the oil economy would need careful assessment.
You’ve Read Your Free Stories For Now
Sign up and keep reading more stories that matter to you.
Although the final judgment must await detailed and accurate information, the Saudi rescue attempt also leaves many questions unanswered. The first attempt had to be aborted. Three of the four terrorists who carried out the crime managed to escape during the rescue operation conducted in broad daylight on Sunday, and the fourth was arrested probably because he was too injured to make good his escape. The exchange ratio of one injured to 22 dead is indeed a poor professional performance. It is also obvious that four large helicopters landing 40 commandos on top of the building at sunrise would have provide an early warning to the terrorists. Little is known about attempts to negotiate the release of hostages, except that the Lebanese ambassador managed to get five of his compatriots released. We, on our part, must now be informed of the exact circumstances under which the Indians were killed.