Blog blocking stalemate continues

All other websites, DoT has told the Internet companies, must continue to be accessed 8216;8216;unhindered8217;8217;. In a statement issued today, DoT has said that by blocking more websites than the 17 in the hot seat, ISPs are in 8216;8216;contravention8217;8217; of its orders.

This is the first time that DoT is placing its cards on the table on the July 13 ban, but its position is remains marred, since not all ISPs seem to have the required technology to selectively block webpages maintained on blogs.

But the government is not playing along with niceties. The official statement issued today paraphrases the new order as saying: 8216;8216;It has come to notice that in some cases the parent website had been blocked in contravention to what was stated in its earlier order.8217;8217;

As if on cue, the ISP Association of India ISPAI has also said that there is technology available to block websites and web pages selectively, and that though not all ISPs may have it now, they can acquire it soon.

On Thursday, one representative of a Delhi-based ISP confirmed that the July 13 order did only mention a few blogspot.com pages and some other websites. 8216;8216;That8217;s why ISPs cannot block blogspot.com completely,8217;8217; he said. This is complicated, because the blocking of pin-pointed 17 websites was not effective and most bloggers had railed against the extensive nature this ban had taken on.

The Thursday order, however, has given some bloggers more teeth to bite the official hand with. An informal coalition-in-the-making of bloggers has now decided to address the government on the blog issue by bringing up tricky legal questions.

8216;8216;By next week we will approach the Supreme Court and sue the government and ISPs on restricting everybody8217;s access to the Internet,8217;8217; says Sarbajit Roy, who plans to lead the bloggers. Roy says he had previously, in 2004, sued all telecom companies in Delhi over restricting calls.

The pivot of this legal action is ironically to be based on the Information Technology Act, 2000. This Act defines 8216;8216;hacking,8217;8217; in Section 66, as gaining illegal access to any website, or preventing access to a website through illegal means.

8216;8216;If this is Section 66, isn8217;t the government and the ISPs both in contravention of the law by preventing thousands of bloggers from getting online? Now, even the government says the ISPs had no right to block access to blogspot.com except those sites mentioned in the July 13 order.8217;8217; says Roy.

Tired of bad publicity, the DoT has turned against ISPs in its July 20 order. It has asked ISPs 8216;8216;Why action should be not taken against them for blocking unintended websites/webpages.8217;8217;