
CHANDIGARH, June 14: The case regarding increase in the retirement age of officers of the Army was first initiated by the late General B.C. Joshi while he was Chief of the Army Staff. It was indeed a step in the right direction. Later, a joint proposal was sent to the government by all the three wings of the Armed Forces. However, amongst the higher ranks of the Army there were some reservations, which ultimately led to the proposal being included in the terms of reference of the Fifth Pay Commission.
While there is no denying the fact that the age profile of the commanding officers of the Arms8217; should be maintained roughly as at present, which can be done with better planning and management by the Military Secretary8217;s branch, the retirement ages for other category of ranks and appointments can be enhanced without compromising on the efficiency of the Armed Forces.
Unfortunately, the critics of the proposal have not taken into consideration a variety of factors and the changing socio-economic conditions in the country and within the armed forces. Army has become a second class profession because little or nothing has been done to improve the service conditions. Those who feel that the Armed Forces would lose its youthful profile with the increase in the retirement age, are perhaps not aware that the quality of physical fitness and general health of even a common citizen has changed for the better. There should be no doubt about the job related physical and mental robustness of an officer who leads a disciplined life and is subjected to regular training courses.
Since the Ministry of Home Affairs had declined to accept lateral induction of officers in the central police organisations, the present proposal is timely. Resultant short time stagnation can be partially looked after by the Directorate General of Resettlement, whose charter of duties can be amended to include placement of desirous superseded officers.
The author 8211; who served in the Cabinet Secretariat, is now settled in SAS Nagar