Premium
This is an archive article published on August 27, 2006

12-yr-old in court for his ‘murder’ trial

A 12-year-old boy, whose parents were jailed for his alleged murder, silently heard arguments on Saturday in a court room on whether he was alive or dead.

.

A 12-year-old boy, whose parents were jailed for his alleged murder, silently heard arguments on Saturday in a court room on whether he was alive or dead.

The court reserved for Monday its order on a bail plea of Ramesh Yadav and Neelu who were charged with killing Gabbar, one of their four children, who used to sell groundnuts on trains before he disappeared.

A body of a child was found near a railway track outside this town on March 20 while Gabbar had been missing for several days but no complaint had been lodged. The police had circulated the body’s photographs but no one identified it till the second week of July.

Story continues below this ad

“I had slept on the train and found myself in Jalgaon when I woke up,’’ Gabbar said, outside the court room, not sure why was he brought there. He spent four months in Jalgaon and about two months in a correctional institution in Bhopal.

Two days ago, Gabbar’s elder brother Kallu alias Tufan and uncle Punam through their advocate moved an application in the chief judicial magistrate’s court saying the couple be discharged because their son they had been accused of killing was alive. The CJM committed the matter to the Sessions Court while rejecting the discharge application.

The couple was picked up by the police from their house in Gwaltoli in the town, and jailed after they allegedly confessed to killing their son. On Saturday, their advocate R.S. Thakur alleged that the couple had given the confession under duress.

Stunned by the developments, the police had made adequate arrangements to ensure that the couple and their son did not come in contact with each other in the court premises.

Story continues below this ad

A government pleader while opposing the bail plea maintained that Gabbar was dead because the body had been identified by his neighbours from the photograph shown to them. He cast doubts on existence of Kallu alias Tufan saying no one by that name existed. “The identity of the person who produced Gabbar itself was suspect,” he argued.

In the Yadav’s neighbourhood every one is certain that Gabbar was alive. When he was brought there on Friday they had hugged him and got themselves photographed with him. “We know him since he was born, how will we make a mistake,’’ asked Raju Lutare, a neighbour.

Ramesh had told the neighbours that Gabbar was in some jail. “Let the police claim whatever, we know for sure that the boy is Gabbar,’’ Brajmohan Bamrele, another neighbour said. Gabbar identified his friends by their names and his schoolmates also identified him on Friday.

Inspector Bhupendrasingh Sengar, who investigated the matter till his transfer on June 8, told The Indian Express that the body had not been identified despite making efforts for months. “I had circulated more than 1,000 pamphlets but no one identified the body,’’ said Sengar and sounded surprised that within a month of his transfer the matter had been solved.

Story continues below this ad

Inspector D.S. Raghuvanshi, who succeeded Sengar, however, claimed that the parents had confessed to the murder. Prosecution argued that a belt and a stick used by Gabbar was recovered from the spot the parents showed.

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement