In a judgement on Monday, the court said the restriction under the Act is only in respect of transportation of cows, bulls or bullocks, that too from a place outside the state to a place within. (File Photo)
Listen to this article
Allahabad HC: In UP law, there is no provision that bars transportation of beef
x
00:00
1x1.5x1.8x
The Allahabad High Court has observed that there is “no bar or restriction of transport of beef even from any place outside the State to any place inside the State” under the regulations of the UP Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act, 1955.
Justice Pankaj Bhatia, in a November 20 ruling, said, “The restrictions on transportation in terms of the Act and the Rules framed thereunder is only applicable in respect of transportation of cow, bull or bullock that too in any place in Uttar Pradesh from any place outside the State.”
“In the entire Act or the rules, there exists no provision barring transportation of beef. The restriction placed under Section 5A of the Cow Slaughter Act is only in respect of transportation of cow, bull or bullock that too only from a place outside the State to any place within the State. There is no bar or restriction of transport of beef even from any place outside the State to any place inside the State,” he said.
Story continues below this ad
The High Court was hearing a criminal revision petition filed by one Vaseem Ahmad of Fatehpur who was booked in a case lodged in 2021 under the Cow Slaughter Act.
The case was lodged based on allegations that four persons, who were on two motorcycles, were apprehended and that they fled leaving behind the motorcycles and on inspection, “one quintal 200 grams of beef was allegedly recovered from the bags”.
The ownership of a motorcycle was traced to Ahmad and he was booked under section 3/5A/8 of the Cow Slaughter Act. Ahmad moved an application for release of the seized motorcycle during the pendency of the case.
The Fatehpur Superintendent of Police, in a report, said Ahmad was chargesheeted and the motorcycle in question was made a case property and was liable to be confiscated. The District Magistrate too stated in an order that the vehicle was liable to be confiscated.
Story continues below this ad
Ahmad’s lawyer Pradeep Kumar told the High Court that “the confiscation is contrary to the mandate of the Act and also violates the rights enshrined under Article 300 (A) of the Constitution of India as the confiscation is not a proper exercise of power, the order deserves to be quashed”.
The Additional Government Advocate, who appeared on behalf of the State, justified the DM’s order by stating that in terms of the report, the vehicle in question was used for transportation of beef.
In its order, the court said, “To attract the power of confiscation conferred by virtue of Rule 7 of Section 5A, it is essential to allege and establish that the vehicle on which beef is being transported is done in violation of the provisions of this Act and the relevant rules. It is essential to note that for transportation of cow, bull or bullock specific rules for issuance of permit are prescribed under Rule 16, however, the transportation of the cow, bull or bullock, within the State of Uttar Pradesh (as is in the present case) does not require any permit as has also been held by this Court in the case of Ashfaq Ahmad Vs. State of UP & another.”
The High Court said that in the present case the allegation – transportation of beef on a vehicle (motorcycle) within two places in the state – is neither prohibited nor regulated. “…thus, the foundation for confiscation on charge of transportation in violation of the provision of this Act is prima facie not established,” it said.
Story continues below this ad
“I have no hesitation in holding that the power of confiscation has been exercised without any authority of law and on a misreading of section 5A(7) of the Cow Slaughter Act and for the said reasons the confiscation order cannot be sustained and is liable to be quashed,” Justice Bhatia said, ordering the DM to release the motorcycle.
Asad Rehman is with the national bureau of The Indian Express and covers politics and policy focusing on religious minorities in India. A journalist for over eight years, Rehman moved to this role after covering Uttar Pradesh for five years for The Indian Express.
During his time in Uttar Pradesh, he covered politics, crime, health, and human rights among other issues. He did extensive ground reports and covered the protests against the new citizenship law during which many were killed in the state.
During the Covid pandemic, he did extensive ground reporting on the migration of workers from the metropolitan cities to villages in Uttar Pradesh. He has also covered some landmark litigations, including the Babri Masjid-Ram temple case and the ongoing Gyanvapi-Kashi Vishwanath temple dispute.
Prior to that, he worked on The Indian Express national desk for three years where he was a copy editor.
Rehman studied at La Martiniere, Lucknow and then went on to do a bachelor's degree in History from Ramjas College, Delhi University. He also has a Masters degree from the AJK Mass Communication Research Centre, Jamia Millia Islamia. ... Read More