Premium

Lookout notice against actor Siddique after Kerala HC denies him bail in rape case

Last month, the complainant, a young actor, had raised the allegation through the media, following which Siddique was forced to step down as the general secretary of the actors’ outfit Association of Malayalam Movie Artistes

SiddiqueSiddique has rubbished all allegations, calling it a “criminal conspiracy to tarnish the reputation of the entire Malayalam film industry”.

The Kerala Police have issued a look out notice for prominent Malayalam actor Siddique days after the high court rejected the anticipatory bail plea in a rape case.

The lookout notice was published in various newspapers in Malayalam and English with Siddique’s photograph. It said he is facing a case under sections 376 (rape) and 506 (criminal intimidation) of the Indian Penal Code, registered at the Museum Police Station in Thiruvananthapuram.

Siddique has been missing since the court rejected his anticipatory bail plea on September 24. The case was registered last month but the police did not take any initiative to arrest him.

Story continues below this ad

In her complaint last month, a young woman actor had raised the rape allegation through the media, following which Siddique was forced to step down as the general secretary of the actors’ outfit Association of Malayalam Movie Artistes (AMMA). Subsequently, the woman filed a complaint with Thiruvananthapuram city police.

Siddique The lookout notice issued against Siddique.

After the Hema committee report was released last month, some women had filed sexual harassment/rape cases against various film professionals, including some prominent actors, in the industry. Except for Siddique, all of them have been granted anticipatory bail.

Rejecting Siddique’s bail application, Judge CS Dias said the “overall scrutiny of the facts, gravity and seriousness of the accusations alleged against the petitioner, coupled with the materials placed on record that prima facie shows the petitioner’s involvement in the crime, that the petitioner’s custodial interrogation is inevitable for the proper investigation of the crime”.

On Siddique’s argument that the complaint lacks credibility, the court said it reflected an “uncharitable view” of the survivor’s circumstances.

Story continues below this ad

“A woman’s experiences of sexual assault are not a reflection of her character but rather an indication of her suffering. The attempt to blame a woman for speaking out may be a strategy to silence her, which is hostile to the supremacy of the law,” the court said.

On the argument that there was a delay of eight years between the alleged incident and the complaint, the court said victims of sexual abuse and assault may experience psychological, emotional and social barriers, which necessarily has to be understood in the context of the trauma.

The incident allegedly happened in 2016 at a hotel room in Thiruvananthapuram. Siddique allegedly got in touch with the survivor through Facebook in 2014 and frequently interacted with her and her mother over the phone and via Skype, encouraging the survivor to work in the cinema and promising to help.

In 2016, the accused had allegedly invited the survivor and her parents to attend the preview of a movie. After the movie, he invited the survivor to a hotel room to discuss a new film and raped her, the complainant had claimed.

Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement

You May Like

Advertisement