An industry that does not pay minimum wages to its workers has no right to continue, says Delhi High Court

Justice C Hari Shankar directed the club to disburse to gardener Geetam Singh the difference in payment between the wages paid and the minimum wages payable to him under the Act from September 1, 1989, to September 1992, in addition to the amount awarded by the labour court. The court also asked the club to pay Rs 50,000 to the man for not complying with the labour court’s order passed 14 years ago directing it to pay Rs 15,240 to Singh for the period between October 1992 and September 1995.

It said the total amount to be paid to the man shall be given with an interest of 12 per cent per annum from the date of award, July 16, 2004, till the date of paying him and directed that the payment should be made within four weeks of the passing of this order. “Non-payment of minimum wages to a workman is unconscionable and unpardonable by law,” the court said, adding, “Minimum wages are the basic entitlement of the workman, and an industry which employs workmen without paying them minimum wages has no right to continue.”

As per the order, Singh had worked with the club from September 13, 1989 till September 30, 1995. Advocate Anuj Aggarwal, appearing for Singh, submitted that the workman was entitled to be paid the difference in wages for the entire period from September 13, 1989 to September 30, 1995 and the labour court materially erred in limiting the award of differential wages only to the period October 1992 to September 1995.

The club’s advocate said they were willing to pay Rs 15,240 awarded by the tribunal, which was the difference between the wages paid to Singh and the minimum wages payable to him for the period October 1992 to September 1995. However, the court said “such magnanimity appeared to have dawned on the club too late in the day” as despite not obtaining any stay from this court, it was admitted that no payment in accordance with the award had been made to the man and he had been paid only litigation expenses.

“This court is, therefore, constrained to observe that any reluctance on the part of an employer to award minimum wages for a workman for the period during which he had admittedly worked is not only illegal and immoral but also invites criminal liability. Such an attitude erodes the very foundations of a socialist society which the preamble of the Constitution professes us to be, and belies the promises held out to every citizen by the Constitution,” it said.

Curated For You

4 years of delay, short 87-km stretch derails Rs 1-lakh-crore Delhi-Mumbai Expressway

Dhurandhar Box Office Collection ​D​ay 13 Update: Ranveer Singh film eyes Rs 460 cr mark in India

Bha Bha Ba Movie Review, Collection Live Updates: Dileep-Mohanlal film earns over Rs 4.5 crore despite mixed reviews