Ananthakrishnan G. is a Senior Assistant Editor with The Indian Express. He has been in the field for over 23 years, kicking off his journalism career as a freelancer in the late nineties with bylines in The Hindu. A graduate in law, he practised in the District judiciary in Kerala for about two years before switching to journalism. His first permanent assignment was with The Press Trust of India in Delhi where he was assigned to cover the lower courts and various commissions of inquiry. He reported from the Delhi High Court and the Supreme Court of India during his first stint with The Indian Express in 2005-2006. Currently, in his second stint with The Indian Express, he reports from the Supreme Court and writes on topics related to law and the administration of justice. Legal reporting is his forte though he has extensive experience in political and community reporting too, having spent a decade as Kerala state correspondent, The Times of India and The Telegraph. He is a stickler for facts and has several impactful stories to his credit. ... Read More
Supreme Court dismisses plea seeking cancellation of Class 10, 12 offline exams
The plea by child rights activist and advocate Anubha Shrivastava Sahai and ‘Student Union of Odisha’ sought direction to state boards, CBSE, CISCE, National Institute of Open Schooling (NIOS), which are scheduled to hold exams, to come up with alternate modes of assessment instead of offline exams in view of the pandemic situation.

Dismissing a plea to cancel board examinations for classes 10 and 12 via physical mode, the Supreme Court said Wednesday that such petitions only give “false hopes” to students preparing for exams and create “more confusion”.
The bench of Justices A M Khanwilkar, Dinesh Maheshwari and C T Ravikumar, warning the petitioner that it will impose exemplary costs if such petitions are filed again, said: “Entertaining such petitions will only create more confusion… Such petitions give false hopes to students who are going to appear for exams. They will be misled.”
The plea by child rights activist and advocate Anubha Shrivastava Sahai and ‘Student Union of Odisha’ sought direction to state boards, CBSE, CISCE, National Institute of Open Schooling (NIOS), which are scheduled to hold exams, to come up with alternate modes of assessment instead of offline exams in view of the pandemic situation.
Appearing for the petitioner, advocate Prashant Padmanabhan referred to the court’s order last year wherein it had approved CBSE and CISCE’s decision to cancel board exams and provide alternate mode of assessment.
But the bench said that was in the past and cannot be the ground for something now. “That petition we entertained because of a particular situation,” Justice Khanwilkar said. On apprehensions expressed by the counsel, the bench said the situation had not come to what he feared. “Let authorities take a decision. We will not pass any orders. Authorities are working in tandem” to finalise exam dates and if there is any problem once it’s finalised, those aggrieved can approach the authorities concerned.
When the counsel said “it will delay the admission process”, Justice Khanwilkar said: “Who are you to decide that? Who are we to decide? What kind of public interest litigation is being filed?… Such petitions create confusion. Last three days, news items everywhere. This has to stop… Let students do their job and let authorities do their job.”
Justice Maheshwari too said “this creates false hope and confusion”. The bench stopped short of imposing any cost on the petitioners.
Photos



- 01
- 02
- 03
- 04
- 05