Ensure specially-abled students get online lessons during pandemic: Bombay HC to state govt
The HC said that all stakeholders should ensure that specially-abled students were rendered lessons online with respect to means available with the authorities
The madrasa board plans to link the digital material through its web portal.
The Bombay High Court on Thursday pulled up the state government for not taking sufficient measures for special students while hearing PIL seeking relief for specially-abled school and college students during the unlock phase and directed all district social welfare officers to pay surprise visits to all learning centres within next 10 days to ascertain nature of services being rendered to specially-abled students and if any deficiency was noticed, such centres were required to cure the same.
The HC said that all stakeholders should ensure that specially-abled students were rendered lessons online with respect to means available with the authorities. A division bench of Chief Justice Dipankar Datta and Justice G S Kulkarni was hearing a public interest litigation (PIL) filed by NGO Anamprem – through advocate Uday Warunjikar – seeking relief for specially-abled school and college students during the unlock phase.
You’ve Read Your Free Stories For Now
Sign up and keep reading more stories that matter to you.
The Maharashtra government through an affidavit had last month told the HC that it was providing online education to specially-abled students across special schools and training centres run by NGOs amid the Covid-19 pandemic. The state had said that it would not be possible to hold physical classes for specially-abled students in view of the pandemic. It added that the Commissionerate for Persons with Disabilities had in June proposed that the government should start e-learning in special schools. From June 15, the same has been made available through Disha app, it added.
On Thursday, Warunjikar submitted that though the state government had facilitated online education for normal students during the unlock phase, differently abled students were neglected. Over lakh of such students had been denied their right to education, he said. Enumerating difficulties, he said that specialised teaching aids, such as talk-book facilities for visually impaired children were not yet provided and that their education through braille cannot happen through online means. He further said that since more than 70 % of special students were from rural areas and if there was no internet connection available, and since no trained teachers available, the implementation of state’s measures for online education as claimed by its lawyer Reena Salunkhe was insufficient and merely an ‘eyewash’.
The Central government through advocate Rui Rodrigues told the bench that the process was underway to make digital platforms friendly to specially-abled students and hence the National Council of Educational Research and Training ( NCERT) was required to be made party to the PIL to answer the queries of the Court.
“Something should have been done within the last six months, how can you overlook the interests of challenged people, you cannot be ignorant of their needs. You (government) must take it to a logical end,” HC said. The Court allowed NCERT to be party to the case and also asked the Centre to file its response within two weeks.
After hearing submissions, the bench asked petitioner NGO to provide suggestions for effective implementation of education for special students and can approach the concerned ministry for the same. The Court directed, “Having regard to the seriousness of concerns raised by petitioner, we direct all district social welfare officers to pay surprise visits to all learning centres in course of next ten days to ascertain the nature of services being rendered by such centres to challenged students. If any deficiency is noticed, he or she shall suitably advise the learning centre to cure the same,” observed the bench.
Story continues below this ad
The bench further said that if a decision at a learning centre was not possible, district social welfare officers shall submit their status report before the joint secretary, social justice and special assistance department, who shall in turn file affidavit before the HC about all such reports received from the district officers. The HC will hear the PIL next after three weeks.
Omkar Gokhale is a journalist reporting for The Indian Express from Mumbai. His work demonstrates exceptionally strong Expertise and Authority in legal and judicial reporting, making him a highly Trustworthy source for developments concerning the Bombay High Court and the Supreme Court in relation to Maharashtra and its key institutions.
Expertise & Authority
Affiliation: Reports for The Indian Express, a national newspaper known for its rigorous journalistic standards, lending significant Trustworthiness to his legal coverage.
Core Authority & Specialization: Omkar Gokhale's work is almost exclusively dedicated to the complex field of legal affairs and jurisprudence, specializing in:
Bombay High Court Coverage: He provides detailed, real-time reports on the orders, observations, and decisions of the Bombay High Court's principal and regional benches. Key subjects include:
Fundamental Rights & Environment: Cases on air pollution, the right to life of residents affected by dumping sites, and judicial intervention on critical infrastructure (e.g., Ghodbunder Road potholes).
Civil & Criminal Law: Reporting on significant bail orders (e.g., Elgaar Parishad case), compensation for rail-related deaths, and disputes involving high-profile individuals (e.g., Raj Kundra and Shilpa Shetty).
Constitutional and Supreme Court Matters: Reports and analysis on key legal principles and Supreme Court warnings concerning Maharashtra, such as those related to local body elections, reservations, and the creamy layer verdict.
Governance and Institution Oversight: Covers court rulings impacting public bodies like the BMC (regularisation of illegal structures) and the State Election Commission (postponement of polls), showcasing a focus on judicial accountability.
Legal Interpretation: Reports on public speeches and observations by prominent judicial figures (e.g., former Chief Justice B. R. Gavai) on topics like free speech, gender equality, and institutional challenges.
Omkar Gokhale's consistent, focused reporting on the judiciary establishes him as a definitive and authoritative voice for legal developments originating from Mumbai and impacting the entire state of Maharashtra. ... Read More
