Premium

Delhi HC seeks Centre’s reply on plea against increasing limit of non-medical faculty for MBBS students

The petition sought the judicial intervention to strike down certain provisions of the Teachers Eligibility Qualifications in Medical Institutions Regulations, 2025, and an amendment notification of July 2, issued by NMC.

Delhi HCAfter completing her master's in law in 1988, Justice Kaur joined the Delhi Judicial Service in 1992 and was promoted to the Delhi Higher Judicial Service (DHJS) in 2003. Ten days after her retirement from the DHJS on September 30, 2023, Justice Kaur was recommended for elevation to the Delhi High Court by the Supreme Court Collegium. (Express Photo)

The Delhi High Court on Thursday sought the Centre’s response on a plea against a notification increasing the limit of non-medical faculty for MBBS students for Anatomy, Physiology, Biochemistry, Microbiology and Pharmacology.

A bench of Chief Justice Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya and Justice Tushar Rao Gedela issued notice to the Centre on the plea, which claimed the regulations were diluting the standards of medical education.

The petition sought the judicial intervention to strike down certain provisions of the Teachers Eligibility Qualifications in Medical Institutions Regulations, 2025, and an amendment notification of July 2, issued by the National Medical Commission (NMC).

Story continues below this ad

“The impugned regulations allow individuals without an MBBS degree and clinical exposure to be appointed as faculty for undergraduate medical education, thereby diluting the standards of medical education and violating the statutory mandates of the National Medical Commission Act, 2019, as well as the Competency Based Medical Education (CBME) curriculum adopted by the NMC,” the petition claimed.

It claimed, earlier the appointment of non-medical teachers was restricted to a maximum of 15 per cent of the total faculty strength in Clinical Phase I departments (Anatomy, Physiology, Biochemistry, Microbiology and Pharmacology) and only in case of non-availability of medical faculty to maintain the quality.

The amendment notification of July 2, however, increased the limit to 30 per cent, giving legitimacy to a parallel, non-clinical cadre of teachers without clinical background or patient care training, in contrary to the legitimate expectation of complete phase out of non-medical faculty, it claimed.

The court posted the matter for September.

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement