Premium
This is an archive article published on August 22, 2020

SC allows three Jain temples in Mumbai to open for two days

With the Ganesh Chaturthi season also due, the bench made it clear that it is making an exception only in this case since the prayer sought involves devotees offering prayers individually, unlike a congregation which will lead to crowds.

Plea in SC to debar persons on trial in serious offence cases from contesting electionsThe court said it will consider the matter after two weeks. (File)

The Supreme Court Friday allowed three Jain temples in Mumbai to open for two days of the holy Paryushan season with strict adherence to Covid-19 control protocols. It wondered why the government, which is allowing activities where money is involved, has a different stand in matters of religion.

“We find it very strange that every activity they are allowing involves commercial interests. They are willing to take the risk when money is involved but when it comes to religion, they say there is Covid and we can’t do this or that,” Chief Justice of India S A Bobde, heading a three-judge bench, said while allowing the Jain temples in Dadar (West), Byculla and Chembur to open on August 22 and 23 “for devotees to perform the rituals connected with Paryushan”.

He made the remarks as senior advocate Dushyant Dave, appearing for petitioner Parshwatilak Shwetamber Murtipujak Jain Trust, took on Maharashtra counsel, senior advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi, for conveying the state’s reservations on the opening of the temples.
Dave assured the court that only five persons will be let in at a time, and 250 a day. “Is the state policing the malls, shops, barber shops etc today? There are congregations in malls and gyms. Thousands of people are standing in line at liquor shops… When a community is saying we can police our people, then why not allow?” he said.

With the Ganesh Chaturthi season also due, the bench made it clear that it is making an exception only in this case since the prayer sought involves devotees offering prayers individually, unlike a congregation which will lead to crowds.

“Having carefully considered the rival submissions, we are of the view that a small reprieve can be granted to the petitioners, without making it a precedent. After all, the petitioners are not seeking to hold any festivities in congregation,” the bench, also comprising Justices A S Bopanna and V Ramasubramanian, said in an interim order.

“We make it clear that this order is not intended to be used as a precedent by other persons to seek permission to hold any festivals/festivities which would involve, by their very nature, congregation of people, such as Ganesh Festival,” the bench said.

The order also recorded the petitioner’s “undertaking” to limit the number of devotees and ordered that it “shall be strictly complied with”.

Story continues below this ad

The petitioner had earlier approached the Bombay High Court for permission to visit temples and perform puja from August 15-23. The High Court “reluctantly” declined to grant urgent relief, but kept the petition pending. The petitioner then moved the Supreme Court, saying only two more days of the Paryushan season remained.

Singhvi said the “State is opposing it because we are already in an unmanageable situation. Huge number of Covid patients in Maharashtra… It is one of the worst affected states”.

He said guidelines issued by the Ministry of Home Affairs has allowed reopening of places of religious worship, but has left it to states to change rules. “They have said states can impose higher thresholds of restrictions,” he said.

“We are a multi-religious, multicultural country. Several religious festivals are coming up… Many festival congregations have been cancelled this year… Other states across India have also cancelled religious festivals,” he said.

Story continues below this ad

The CJI said “this is a dynamic situation”, and asked why can’t it be allowed if the MHA Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) can be enforced and there is an undertaking.

“This is exactly the choice we were faced with in the Orissa Jagannath Yatra case… We were assured that if distance can be maintained and safeguards kept, then merely pulling the Rath will not have a detrimental effect,” the CJI said, adding that the court was informed that nothing adverse happened.

Singhvi reminded the court about the Ganpati festival. The bench said the state will have to take a case-by-case decision and there can be no blanket permission or blanket ban.

“If it’s a matter of only five people at a time in one temple, and this pattern can be followed in all temples, then why not allow it? If it can be followed then why just Jain temples, why not have it in Hindu temples, mosques?… The issue will be: who will implement it?… Who will police it to ensure that rules are followed?” the CJI observed.

Story continues below this ad

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta said the Centre has no difficulty in permitting the prayer if the petitioner complies with the MHA SOP of June 4 which prescribes preventive measures.

Mehta said the Ganpati festival stands on a different footing because it is, by nature, a congregation.

“We were forgiven by Lord Jagannath, so we will be forgiven again… We are informed that in Jain religion, there is no God,” the CJI remarked.

Making a climbdown, Singhvi said, “we can allow rituals at one or two of the temples which are managed by this Trust, so they (the Trust) can be made responsible for implementing the rules”.

Story continues below this ad

Dave said Covid-19 has created a huge mental stress, and allowing the rituals will help people.

Ananthakrishnan G. is a Senior Assistant Editor with The Indian Express. He has been in the field for over 23 years, kicking off his journalism career as a freelancer in the late nineties with bylines in The Hindu. A graduate in law, he practised in the District judiciary in Kerala for about two years before switching to journalism. His first permanent assignment was with The Press Trust of India in Delhi where he was assigned to cover the lower courts and various commissions of inquiry. He reported from the Delhi High Court and the Supreme Court of India during his first stint with The Indian Express in 2005-2006. Currently, in his second stint with The Indian Express, he reports from the Supreme Court and writes on topics related to law and the administration of justice. Legal reporting is his forte though he has extensive experience in political and community reporting too, having spent a decade as Kerala state correspondent, The Times of India and The Telegraph. He is a stickler for facts and has several impactful stories to his credit. ... Read More

Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Loading Taboola...
Advertisement