This is an archive article published on November 26, 2014
HC raps govt for leaving cops ‘poorly armed’
Shinde conceded that a policy revision was needed and said modern weaponry was being made available to the police force.
Written by Aamir Khan
Mumbai | Updated: November 26, 2014 08:48 AM IST
3 min read
Whatsapp
twitter
Facebook
Reddit
The Bombay High Court on Tuesday rapped the state government for not carrying out changes to its weapons policy even after the experience of the 26/11 terror attacks six years ago that left many police personnel dead since they were not adequately armed.
The court was hearing a PIL on the shortage of police personnel and delay in probes, which originated from a petition filed by one Ashwini Rane, whose husband Nikhil, a Pune-based builder, was killed in 2009. After police failed to crack the case, Rane had moved the HC seeking a CBI probe. The case was handed over to the CBI in 2011, but the probe agency too failed to crack the case. Later, HC suo motu converted Rane’s petition into a PIL.
During the hearing on Tuesday, the HC bench of Justices V M Kanade and Anuja Prabhudessai said the state government should revise its weapons policy every three years. “… It is unfortunate that the 2010 policy has not been revised despite the fact that 26/11 terror attacks took place in 2008 and various attacks have taken place thereafter,” the court said.
During 26/11, it was because of lack of bullet-proof jackets that policemen lost their lives, it said.
The court also asked public prosecutor Sandip Shinde for an “urgent intervention” as there still existed a “threat perception”.
“Day in day out we pass judgments and strictures against police for not investigating cases properly, but if the state is not doing anything for them (police), we cannot expect anything in return,” said the division bench.
Senior lawyer Anil Anturkar, who appeared for the petitioner, told the court that the police personnel had to survive on meagre incentives by the state. He said while a food allowance of Rs 840 was given to police inspectors every month, constables were getting Rs 700. Besides, a monthly incentive of Rs 250 was being given to constables and inspectors, which worked out to just Rs 8 a day.
Story continues below this ad
Hearing this, the court said, “One does not even get a vada pav for Rs 8 nowadays.”
Shinde conceded that a policy revision was needed and said modern weaponry was being made available to the police force.
He said while 7.62 self-loading rifles (SLRs) were being provided to 40 per cent of the force, shotguns were being given to 30 per cent and while the rest 30 per cent would be armed with 9 mm pistols.
In the end, the court said, “We expect that a committee is constituted by the Director General of Police so the process of revision of weapons policy starts and is completed expeditiously.”
Story continues below this ad
Observing that the police were facing “new challenges”, the court asked the state to provide adequate training every two years to police personnel. An allowance of Rs 250 is inadequate and needs to be revised with immediate effect, it said.
Aamir Khan is the Head-Legal Project for Indian Express Digital, based in New Delhi. With over 14 years of professional experience, Aamir's background as a legal professional and a veteran journalist allows him to bridge the gap between complex judicial proceedings and public understanding.
Expertise
Specialized Legal Authority: Aamir holds an LLB from CCS University, providing him with the formal legal training necessary to analyze constitutional matters, statutes, and judicial precedents with technical accuracy.
Experience
Press Trust of India (PTI): Served as News Editor, where he exercised final editorial judgment on legal stories emerging from the Supreme Court of India and various High Courts for the nation's primary news wire.
Bar and Bench: As Associate Editor, he led the vanguard of long-form legal journalism, conducting exclusive interviews and producing deep-dive investigative series on the most pressing legal issues of the day.
Foundational Reporting: His expertise is built on years of "boots-on-the-ground" reporting for The Indian Express (Print) and The Times of India, covering the legal beats in the high-intensity hubs of Mumbai and Delhi.
Multidisciplinary Academic Background: * LLB, CCS University.
PG Diploma in Journalism (New Media), Asian College of Journalism (ACJ), Chennai.
BSc in Life Sciences and Chemistry, Christ College, Bangalore—an asset for reporting on environmental law, patent litigation, and forensic evidence. ... Read More