This is an archive article published on August 23, 2023
Ensure cops in state maintain case diaries ‘without lame excuses’: Bombay HC to DGP
A division bench of Justice Ajey S Gadkari and Shivkumar G Dige on August 19 was hearing a writ plea by senior management officials of Motilal Oswal Financial Services Limited who were alleged to have outraged modesty of the complainant woman, a senior official of the firm.
The bench said that it was expected from the DGP, who is the highest police authority in the state, to ensure his directions are strictly followed by his subordinate officers within three weeks from the date of order.
Listen to this article
Ensure cops in state maintain case diaries ‘without lame excuses’: Bombay HC to DGP
x
00:00
1x1.5x1.8x
The Bombay High Court recently asked the Director General of Police (DGP) to ensure that “the directions issued by his office pertaining to maintenance of ‘case diary’ as per Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) and relevant circulars are followed by his subordinate officers and/or the lower rank officers in its proper spirit, without giving any lame excuses.”
A case diary is a record of daily investigation into a case to be maintained by investigation officers. The bench expressed displeasure over multiple cases, wherein police stations have not followed requisite procedures in maintaining case diaries as per Section 172 of Cr PC and said that court was prompted to refer to such cases to DGP. However, there was no improvement.
A division bench of Justice Ajey S Gadkari and Shivkumar G Dige on August 19 was hearing a writ plea by senior management officials of Motilal Oswal Financial Services Limited who were alleged to have outraged modesty of the complainant woman, a senior official of the firm.
The woman was placed under suspension in March, 2022 on receiving complaints by the management, after which she registered an FIR against the petitioners in May, 2022. An independent inquiry by an external committee was ordered in the matter.
On June 10 last year, the HC, while stating that while the probe will go on, had granted interim relief to the petitioners from coercive action and the same was continued from time to time. On August 18, the HC had perused a case diary of the said crime and had observed that it was maintained in contravention of Section 172(1B) (due pagination of the diary) of the CrPC and also in utter disregard to the circulars issued by DGP in January, 2017 and December, 2018.
On August 19, the bench noted that it is “yet another case” of case diary not maintained as per law and observed, “It appears to us that, the circulars issued by the DGP have not reached to the lower rank officers of the police department in Maharashtra. On at least three occasions, we have referred such cases to the office of the DGP. However there is no improvement till date.”
On August 19, the bench observed that by misinterpreting June, 2022 HC order, the police officers failed to take the probe to its logical end in over a year.
Story continues below this ad
“It was abundantly made clear that the investigation of the present crime may go on. However, no coercive steps were to be adopted against the petitioners. We were informed that the said paragraph has been interpreted as ‘no investigation at all’ to be carried out further and therefore the Investigating Officer has not taken the investigation to its logical end in more than one year. We are aghast to hear such submissions. Order dated June 10, 2022 is in plain language and requires no further interpretation on that behalf,” the HC observed.
Observing this, the bench requested DGP to personally peruse the record of investigation in the present crime along with the case diary, “which is maintained in the form of loose sheets” and adopt appropriate remedial measures as per law in that regard.
The bench said that it was expected from the DGP, who is the highest police authority in the state, to ensure his directions are strictly followed by his subordinate officers within three weeks from the date of order. The bench has posted the next hearing on September 13.
Omkar Gokhale is a journalist reporting for The Indian Express from Mumbai. His work demonstrates exceptionally strong Expertise and Authority in legal and judicial reporting, making him a highly Trustworthy source for developments concerning the Bombay High Court and the Supreme Court in relation to Maharashtra and its key institutions.
Expertise & Authority
Affiliation: Reports for The Indian Express, a national newspaper known for its rigorous journalistic standards, lending significant Trustworthiness to his legal coverage.
Core Authority & Specialization: Omkar Gokhale's work is almost exclusively dedicated to the complex field of legal affairs and jurisprudence, specializing in:
Bombay High Court Coverage: He provides detailed, real-time reports on the orders, observations, and decisions of the Bombay High Court's principal and regional benches. Key subjects include:
Fundamental Rights & Environment: Cases on air pollution, the right to life of residents affected by dumping sites, and judicial intervention on critical infrastructure (e.g., Ghodbunder Road potholes).
Civil & Criminal Law: Reporting on significant bail orders (e.g., Elgaar Parishad case), compensation for rail-related deaths, and disputes involving high-profile individuals (e.g., Raj Kundra and Shilpa Shetty).
Constitutional and Supreme Court Matters: Reports and analysis on key legal principles and Supreme Court warnings concerning Maharashtra, such as those related to local body elections, reservations, and the creamy layer verdict.
Governance and Institution Oversight: Covers court rulings impacting public bodies like the BMC (regularisation of illegal structures) and the State Election Commission (postponement of polls), showcasing a focus on judicial accountability.
Legal Interpretation: Reports on public speeches and observations by prominent judicial figures (e.g., former Chief Justice B. R. Gavai) on topics like free speech, gender equality, and institutional challenges.
Omkar Gokhale's consistent, focused reporting on the judiciary establishes him as a definitive and authoritative voice for legal developments originating from Mumbai and impacting the entire state of Maharashtra. ... Read More