Premium
This is an archive article published on August 7, 2023

How such ‘enormous’ benefits offered to BDD chawls at cost of public exchequer, HC asks MHADA

The court questioned the lawyer representing MHADA as to how such ‘bonanza’ can be offered ‘at the cost of public exchequer.’

bdd chawl redevelopment, bdd chawl, chawl bombay, maharashtra housing, maharashtra housing and area development authority, bombay development directorate, worli, mumbai news, indian express newsBDD chawls. (File photo)
Listen to this article
How such ‘enormous’ benefits offered to BDD chawls at cost of public exchequer, HC asks MHADA
x
00:00
1x 1.5x 1.8x

The Bombay High Court recently termed the benefits offered to chawl occupants as ‘enormous’. After it was informed by the MHADA that eligible occupants of the existing BDD chawls situated in Central Mumbai’s Naigaon would be provided with an alternative accommodation of a 500-square feet carpet area in lieu of their present premises of 160-sq ft along with no maintenance charges for 12 years, the court noted that the benefits extended were ‘enormous.’

It questioned the lawyer representing Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority (MHADA) as to how such ‘bonanza’ can be offered ‘at the cost of public exchequer.’

The bench said it was ‘unconscionable’ that though the three petitioners occupying tenements in BDD Chawls at Naigaon area were offered such benefits where the ongoing market rate is almost above Rs 70,000 per sq ft, they still had a grievance.

The court directed the three petitioners to vacate their premises within 15 days of the MHADA executing Permanent Alternative Accommodation Agreement (PAAA), so that the redevelopment can progress further.

A division bench of Justice Girish S Kulkarni and Justice Jitendra S Jain on August 2 was hearing a plea by Sandesh Dayanand Mohite and two others seeking direction to restrict the authorities from taking action against members of five buildings, forcing them to vacate the rooms during monsoon.

The petitioners, through advocates Medha Jondhale and Anand Jondhale, claimed that they represented five buildings. However, the bench noted that there is no registered association of persons pursuing present plea and it could not accept that the plea is filed in a representative capacity and therefore restricted to three petitioners.

The redevelopment of BDD chawls is being executed at three sites including Worli, Naigaon and N M Joshi Marg involving 195 chawls. The petitioners’ premises are part of redevelopment of 42 chawls situated on 6.45 hectares of land. The MHADA had awarded a contract for redevelopment of Naigaon BDD chawls at Rs 2,902.39 crore and the project was set to commence from July, 2017 and to end in April, 2024.

Story continues below this ad

Advocates P G Lad, Sayli Apte and Shreya Shah for MHADA informed that a total 3,289 residential tenements are to be constructed as PAA for existing occupants of said chawls along with 55 non-residential tenements, making a contractor to undertake construction of 3,344 premises. The redevelopment at Naigaon consists of 20 buildings with 3 basements plus stilt plus 19/23 upper floors. Moreover, eligible existing occupants would be provided a tenement of 500 sq ft carpet area each against their original tenement of 160 sq ft and there will be no maintenance charges levied on them for 12 years.

“As informed to us by Lad, the benefits which are being extended to the occupants of these chawls are enormous,” the bench noted. After the court asked as to “how at the cost of public exchequer such a bonanza can be offered,” Lad submitted that he had a reservation to comment on it.

“Be that as it may, we are of the opinion that in respect of chawls in question as informed by Lad, about 828 occupants have already been shifted and about 1,000 occupants are yet to be shifted. The primary anxiety of the petitioners appears to be that MHADA is not coming forward to execute PAAA,” the HC noted.

After MHADA said that it is prepared to immediately enter into the PAAAs, the court asked petitioners to approach MHADA officers for execution of PAAA within one week from a date of order, to which the authority said its concerned officer will be available on the site for the same.

Story continues below this ad

The bench, while disposing of the plea, said that it was not inclined to examine the larger issues raised by the petitioners and the same can be considered in appropriate proceedings.

Omkar Gokhale is a journalist reporting for The Indian Express from Mumbai. His work demonstrates exceptionally strong Expertise and Authority in legal and judicial reporting, making him a highly Trustworthy source for developments concerning the Bombay High Court and the Supreme Court in relation to Maharashtra and its key institutions. Expertise & Authority Affiliation: Reports for The Indian Express, a national newspaper known for its rigorous journalistic standards, lending significant Trustworthiness to his legal coverage. Core Authority & Specialization: Omkar Gokhale's work is almost exclusively dedicated to the complex field of legal affairs and jurisprudence, specializing in: Bombay High Court Coverage: He provides detailed, real-time reports on the orders, observations, and decisions of the Bombay High Court's principal and regional benches. Key subjects include: Fundamental Rights & Environment: Cases on air pollution, the right to life of residents affected by dumping sites, and judicial intervention on critical infrastructure (e.g., Ghodbunder Road potholes). Civil & Criminal Law: Reporting on significant bail orders (e.g., Elgaar Parishad case), compensation for rail-related deaths, and disputes involving high-profile individuals (e.g., Raj Kundra and Shilpa Shetty). Constitutional and Supreme Court Matters: Reports and analysis on key legal principles and Supreme Court warnings concerning Maharashtra, such as those related to local body elections, reservations, and the creamy layer verdict. Governance and Institution Oversight: Covers court rulings impacting public bodies like the BMC (regularisation of illegal structures) and the State Election Commission (postponement of polls), showcasing a focus on judicial accountability. Legal Interpretation: Reports on public speeches and observations by prominent judicial figures (e.g., former Chief Justice B. R. Gavai) on topics like free speech, gender equality, and institutional challenges. Omkar Gokhale's consistent, focused reporting on the judiciary establishes him as a definitive and authoritative voice for legal developments originating from Mumbai and impacting the entire state of Maharashtra. ... Read More

Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Loading Taboola...
Advertisement