skip to content
Advertisement

Bombay HC pulls up CBFC for not providing objections to film on UP CM Yogi Adityanath, makers to appeal rejection

The HC asked the revising committee to inform the makers of the “objectionable scenes or dialogues” by August 11, after which the makers are required to inform the court of their decision on the changes they intend to make by August 12.

UP CM Yogi Adityanath biopic, The Monk Who Became Chief Minister, CBFC to decide on Yogi film, Bombay HC on Yogi filmUttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath

The Bombay High Court on Thursday directed the makers of a movie purportedly based on Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath to move the revising committee of the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) after it was informed that CBFC’s examination panel has refused to certify it.

The HC asked the revising committee to inform the makers of the “objectionable scenes or dialogues” by August 11, after which the makers are required to inform the court of their decision on the changes they intend to make by August 12.

A bench of Justices Revati Mohite-Dere and Neela K Gokhale was hearing a plea by Samrat Cinematics India Pvt Ltd, the makers of the movie, Ajey: The Untold Story of a Yogi, who had approached the HC last month.

Story continues below this ad

The petitioners said the movie, inspired by the book, The Monk Who Became Chief Minister, authored by Shantanu Gupta, was scheduled to be released in theatres on August 1.

The makers had alleged “unreasonable and arbitrary” delay by the CBFC in clearing the movie. The HC had earlier asked the board to watch the movie and pass a reasoned order.

On Thursday, senior advocate Abhay Khandeparkar for CBFC informed the bench that the board screened the movie as per HC’s directions and passed an order on August 6 rejecting to certify the movie. He said the makers can approach the revising panel of the board to challenge the decision.

Khandeparkar claimed the objections raised by CBFC were not only that the movie was based on a Constitutional figure, but certain scenes could be considered as “defamatory” and “objectionable”.

Story continues below this ad

On the other hand, advocate Aseem Naphade for the filmmakers claimed the CBFC did not inform them about “objectionable” scenes or dialogues before rejection to certify it despite it being mandated under the Cinematograph Act.

The HC then pulled up the board and observed a mere two-line reason given by the CBFC was “not enough” and said it should have been brought to the makers’ notice so that they could consider giving a “disclaimer”.

The HC orally remarked that the CBFC’s order was not adhering to the rules. The court also clarified that the board will not insist on any certificate or affidavit from any authority to certify the film. The HC will hear the plea next on August 14.

Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement

You May Like

Advertisement
Advertisement